An exploratory study on managerial coaching in HRM: for MBA students (information from perplexity.ai)
My question 1: "What is managerial coaching all about in Human Resource Management?"
The reply: "Managerial coaching in Human Resource Management (HRM) refers to a strategic and ongoing process where managers act as coaches to facilitate employee development, enhance performance, and foster positive workplace relationships. It involves a partnership between managers and employees aimed at achieving clarity in goals, improving skills, and motivating staff, ultimately contributing to organizational success.
Core Aspects of Managerial Coaching
Definition and Focus: It is described as an ongoing, face-to-face process that influences behavior by collaboratively working on increasing job knowledge, skills, satisfaction, and professional growth. It is distinct from formal training, emphasizing real-time feedback, support, and developmental conversations.
Relationship Building: Managerial coaching helps build trust and a positive manager-subordinate relationship, essential for employee motivation and engagement.
Impact and Outcomes: Evidence suggests that effective managerial coaching results in improved employee performance, higher job satisfaction, increased motivation, self-efficacy, and organizational commitment.
Practical Application and Benefits
Enhancing Performance: Managers use coaching to set expectations, clarify roles, and support employees in achieving their full potential. It is a core activity for managers aiming for optimal team performance.
Leadership Development: Coaching is increasingly viewed as a leadership tool that stimulates a positive organizational culture and develops managerial skills.
Remote and Diverse Teams: Coaching strategies, including virtual coaching, are adaptable for remote teams, supporting trust and motivation even outside traditional office settings.
Importance in HRM
Managerial coaching aligns with modern HR practices emphasizing participative management and knowledge sharing within organizations. It contributes to employee development, organizational agility, and competitive advantage. It also supports leadership development programs and contributes to fostering a coaching culture that empowers employees at all levels.
In summary, managerial coaching in HRM is about leveraging managerial influence to develop employees through ongoing, supportive, and goal-oriented interactions that improve individual and team performance while fostering a motivating and trust-based work environment."
My question 2: "What are the theories to study this topic?"
The reply: "Theories to study managerial coaching in Human Resource Management encompass a range of behavioral, cognitive, and developmental perspectives. Key theories and models include:
Beliefs and Mindsets Theory: This focuses on the coaching beliefs that managers hold, influencing how they enact coaching behaviors. For example, Ellinger and Bostrom (2002) identified clusters of managerial coaching beliefs centering on role identity, relationship building, and learning facilitation. Hunt and Weintraub’s coaching mindset theory includes attitudes such as empathy, openness, high standards, and employee development orientation.
Behavioral Taxonomies: Theories here classify managerial coaching behaviors such as providing feedback, accountability, listening, delegating, empowering, and tailoring coaching to individual employees’ needs. These behavioral approaches have been developed through research to describe effective coaching actions.
Developmental Readiness and Learning Models: A three-phase model of managerial coach learning and development describes the manager’s readiness for learning coaching skills, developmental pathways including formal training and practice, and resulting outcomes. This model emphasizes cognitive, affective, and motivational elements influencing coaching effectiveness.
Social Cognition Theory: Used to explain how managerial coaching skills relate to team performance, focusing on the role of team-level knowledge and managers' learning goal orientation as mediating and moderating factors, respectively.
Systemic and Holistic Theories: Some scholars advocate viewing managerial coaching as a discrete discipline requiring systemic approaches rather than focusing solely on individual behaviors, integrating leadership, communication, and organizational change theories.
In summary, studying managerial coaching in HRM draws on integrated theories including cognitive-belief models, behavioral frameworks, developmental learning models, social cognition, and systemic leadership theories to understand how managers effectively coach employees and influence outcomes."
My question 3: "What are the research gaps and issues on this topic?"
The reply: "The research gaps and issues in the topic of managerial coaching in Human Resource Management include:
Context-Specific Research Deficiency: There is limited research on managerial coaching in specific sectors such as the public sector, with a lack of models connecting managerial coaching, self-efficacy, and competency development in these contexts. Most studies have focused on general organizational settings without diving deeply into sector-specific dynamics.
Real-Time and Context-Aware Coaching Limitations: Traditional coaching often lacks real-time, evidence-based insights and a comprehensive understanding of organizational contexts, which limits its effectiveness. Managers may struggle with guidance that is not tailored to their unique environmental challenges or that does not address real-time decision-making issues.
Scalability and Accessibility Challenges: Professional coaching is costly, time-consuming, and often unavailable to all managers, which reduces its impact. Many managers do not receive coaching or fail to engage fully, creating a gap in leadership development support across organizations.
Integration of Latest Research and Technology: Many coaches are not consistently updated with the latest research or best practices in coaching. Meanwhile, AI-driven coaching tools often fail to replicate the adaptive and nuanced support provided by human coaches, leading to suboptimal coaching experiences.
Complexity of Coaching Impact on Outcomes: The relationship between managerial coaching and outcomes such as turnover intention, work engagement, and employability is complex and influenced by multiple mediating factors such as organizational culture and individual differences. More nuanced, multi-variable research is needed to unravel these dynamics.
Need for Tailored Coaching Programs: There is a call for coaching programs that better align with organizational culture and employee experience levels, recognizing that one-size-fits-all approaches are less effective.
These gaps highlight the need for more context-sensitive, scalable, real-time, and research-informed coaching frameworks and tools to enhance managerial coaching’s effectiveness in HRM."
My question 4: "What have been the Hong Kong public media-reported issues on this topic over the past 20 years?"
The reply: "Public media-reported issues on managerial coaching in Hong Kong over the past 20 years are not extensively documented as a distinct topic in public media. However, related concerns have frequently appeared within broader discussions about human resource management, leadership development, and organizational culture in Hong Kong workplaces:
Traditional vs. Modern HR Practices: Hong Kong media and academic reports have underscored tensions between traditional performance management systems characterized by infrequent feedback and rating-based evaluations, and newer approaches that emphasize continuous feedback, forward-looking coaching conversations, and employee engagement. These transitions reflect persistent challenges in managerial coaching adoption and effectiveness.
Leadership Development Challenges: Reports highlight challenges faced by middle managers in effectively coaching employees, often due to inadequate training, lack of time, and organizational support. This points to a gap between expectations of managerial coaching and on-the-ground realities in Hong Kong’s corporate environment.
Cultural and Structural Barriers: Hong Kong organizations have been reported to face structural and cultural barriers to implementing coaching as a routine managerial practice. Issues such as hierarchical organizational culture, high work pressure, and limited openness to dialogue have been cited as deterrents to effective coaching relationships.
Role of Media and Communication in HR Issues: Public discussions in media have involved concerns about transparency, trust-building, and communication strategies, which indirectly impact coaching culture as coaching relies heavily on open communication and trust between managers and employees.
In summary, Hong Kong public media over the past two decades have focused on issues like the slow adoption of modern coaching-oriented HR practices, leadership development hurdles, cultural barriers in organizations, and communication challenges — all of which influence the practice and impact of managerial coaching in HRM."
My question 5: "Propose 4 related research objectives and 2 related research issues on this topic for a part-time MBA dissertation project with a duration of 4 months. Also suggest 2 primary research methods and 1 secondary research method for this project based on pragmatism."
The reply: "For a part-time MBA dissertation project on managerial coaching in Human Resource Management with a 4-month duration, the following research objectives, research issues, and research methods are suggested based on pragmatism and insights from the literature:
Research Objectives
To examine the impact of managerial coaching on employees' in-role and innovative work performance.
To explore the mediating effects of role clarity and psychological empowerment in the relationship between managerial coaching and employee outcomes.
To identify the key behaviors and competencies of effective managerial coaches within organizations.
To evaluate the challenges and enablers of implementing managerial coaching in Hong Kong organizational contexts.
Research Issues
The limited empirical evidence on how managerial coaching translates into measurable employee performance improvements, particularly in innovation and role clarity.
Organizational and cultural barriers affecting the adoption and effectiveness of managerial coaching in fast-paced, hierarchical work environments.
Research Methods Based on Pragmatism
Primary Research Methods:
Survey with Quantitative Analysis: To collect data on employee perceptions of managerial coaching and its impact on performance and empowerment.
Semi-Structured Interviews: To gain qualitative insights from managers and employees about their experiences, challenges, and best practices in managerial coaching.
Secondary Research Method:
Systematic Literature Review: To synthesize existing empirical studies, theoretical models, and practices of managerial coaching globally and within Hong Kong to contextualize findings.
This mixed-methods approach aligns with a pragmatic research philosophy by combining quantitative evidence and qualitative understanding to address the research objectives comprehensively, while managing the scope feasible within a 4-month project timeframe."
My question 6: "Comment on the originality, academic and practical values of this study. Also comment on the research ethics issues involved in this study."
The reply: "This study on managerial coaching in Human Resource Management has significant originality, academic, and practical value, alongside important ethical considerations.
Originality
The study contributes originality by integrating managerial coaching skills, coaching beliefs, and employee performance into a cohesive research framework. It uniquely explores the specific behaviors and beliefs of managerial coaches, including those less studied like the learning-fun subtheme, and focuses on real-world organizational contexts such as Hong Kong. This contributes fresh insights to the coaching literature, especially from the dual perspectives of managers and employees, which is less common in existing works.
Academic Value
Academically, the study advances understanding by filling gaps regarding the mechanisms linking managerial coaching to employee outcomes such as role clarity, empowerment, and innovative performance. It contributes empirical evidence and theoretical refinement, testing social cognition and developmental learning theories in workplace coaching. The inclusion of cross-level effects like team-level knowledge and manager learning orientation adds further rigor. It also offers a foundation for future research on systemic and culturally specific coaching approaches.
Practical Value
Practically, the study supports HR practitioners and organizational leaders by identifying effective coaching behaviors and contextual barriers to coaching success. Insights on coaching challenges in hierarchical and fast-paced environments help tailor leadership development programs. The findings guide improvements in coaching training, policy design, and organizational culture shifts that foster trust, communication, and continuous learning, enhancing employee motivation and performance.
Research Ethics Issues
Ethical considerations involve ensuring confidentiality and informed consent when collecting data from managers and employees, especially since coaching interactions are personal and may involve sensitive feedback. Avoiding power imbalance bias and protecting participants from coercion or adverse consequences is critical. Anonymizing identifiable info, securing data storage, and practicing transparency about study purposes and use of findings are important ethical practices. Addressing these respects participant dignity and promotes trustworthy, responsible research conduct.
In sum, this study is original and valuable academically and practically while necessitating rigor in ethical research standards to protect participant welfare and data integrity."
My question 7: "Provide 4 non-academic and 4 academic references for this study in Harvard reference format."
The reply: "Here are 4 non-academic and 4 academic references in Harvard reference format suitable for the study on managerial coaching:
Non-Academic References
Ho, J.K.K. (2008) ‘E-coaching for management development in Hong Kong’, ICHL 2008 Proceedings, City University of Hong Kong. Available at: https://ihlsociety.org/ICHL2008/local-proceedings/ICHL2008-PP069-077-9Pages.pdf (Accessed: 18 October 2025).
Corporate Coaching Partners (2025) ‘Critical success factors for e-coaching implementation’. Available at: http://www.corporatecoachingpartners.com/ (Accessed: 18 October 2025).
Boldly (2024) ‘Executive coaching case studies’, Boldly. Available at: https://boldly.app/casestudies (Accessed: 18 October 2025).
Information Services Department, Hong Kong Government (2025) ‘DH urges positive emotional management to echo World Mental Health Day’. Available at: https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/202510/10/P2025100900583.htm (Accessed: 18 October 2025).
Academic References
Nyfoudi, M., Shipton, H., Theodorakopoulos, N. and Budhwar, P. (2023) ‘Managerial coaching skill and team performance: How does the relationship work and under what conditions?’, Human Resource Management Journal, 33(2), pp. 300-317. doi: 10.1111/1748-8583.12443.
Chan, J. (2015) ‘Coaching the coaches: A development program in a Hong Kong-based organization’, Human Resource Development International, 18(6), pp. 560-570. doi: 10.1080/13678868.2015.1075570.
Chum, P. (2020) ‘Navigating managerial coaching in Hong Kong’s corporate sector’, Doctoral thesis, University of Wales Trinity Saint David. Available at: https://repository.uwtsd.ac.uk/id/eprint/3697/1/Chum_P_DBA_Thesis.pdf (Accessed: 18 October 2025).
Ho, J.K.K. (2008) ‘E-coaching for Management Development in Hong Kong: An examination of market potential and business value’, ICHL 2008 Proceedings, City University of Hong Kong. Available at: https://ihlsociety.org/ICHL2008/local-proceedings/ICHL2008-PP069-077-9Pages.pdf (Accessed: 18 October 2025).
These references combine scholarly insight and practical knowledge relevant to Hong Kong’s context and global managerial coaching literature."
A collection of blog notes on using chatgpt for research purpose.
No comments:
Post a Comment