A brief note on narrative in narrative interview: for Housing Studies students (information from perplexity.ai)
My question 1: "Highlight 8 main ideas of narrative (the basic narrative structure, types of narrative structures and the characteristics of different narrative types, etc.) in the context of narrative interview."
The reply: "Here are 8 main ideas of narrative in the context of narrative interviews, covering basic narrative structure, types, and characteristics:
Basic Narrative Structure: A narrative typically includes a beginning, middle, and end, creating a flow where events lead sequentially from an opening through rising action to a conclusion or closure. This structure organizes the story naturally for the listener or reader.
Narrative Interview Phases: Narrative interviews unfold in stages, beginning with initiation, then narration (where the interviewee tells their story freely), followed by questioning to clarify or extend, and concluding with a closing talk. This allows stories to emerge with minimal interviewer imposition.
Types of Narrative Structures: Common narrative structures include classic story structure (exposition, rising action, climax, resolution), the heroic journey (departure, initiation, return), three-act structure (setup, confrontation, resolution), seven-point structure, and others like the Fichtean Curve. Each offers a different way to frame and pace stories.
Characteristics of Narrative Interviews: Unlike structured interviews, narrative interviews minimize researcher-imposed order and wording of questions, thereby allowing interviewees to control the narrative’s direction, content, and emphasis, revealing authentic perspectives.
Content and Performance: Narratives are about both what is told (content) and how it is told (structure and performance). The storyteller’s choice of structure, language, and interaction with the listener shapes the meaning and impact of the narrative.
Storytelling as Sense-Making: Individuals use narratives to make sense of experiences by ordering events to convey meaning, linking personal experience to broader social or cultural contexts. Narrative interview questions invite this personal storytelling.
Types of Narrative Interview Questions: Typically beginning with one open, broad question that encourages an uninterrupted narrative, followed by more focused questions to gather details, and optionally a second interview for specific data, enhancing depth and richness.
Advantages and Challenges: Narrative interviews provide rich, detailed data reflecting individuals’ lived experiences and viewpoints, but can be data-intensive and time-consuming to analyze. Quality varies with participants’ storytelling ability and comfort.
These ideas collectively explain how narrative interviews capitalize on storytelling’s natural structure to elicit deep, participant-led accounts that reveal meanings and experiences in their own terms. The narrative types and structures provide varied frameworks to understand and analyze these stories."
My question 2: "Please clarify what the narrative recorded in a narrative interview would look like with reference the following narrative background: "a middle-age male citizen who was a factory manager in China and had a family in China. He gambled a lot and had a very hot temper a few years ago. He has been a rough sleeper in Sham Shui Po of Hong Kong for over 2 years. His wife and his child has already left him."."
The reply: "In a narrative interview with the given background—a middle-aged male former factory manager from China who had a gambling problem and a hot temper, and who has been homeless in Sham Shui Po, Hong Kong for over two years after his wife and child left him—the narrative recorded would likely unfold as a personal life story shaped by distinct phases and emotions.
The narrative would start with situating the interviewee’s life context: his past role as a factory manager in China, his family situation, and personal challenges like gambling and temper issues. This sets the "Situation" and "Task" or central conflict in his life story. The narration would then move into the "Action" phase, detailing specific events or decisions that led to his current homelessness—perhaps describing struggles at work, family breakdown, and turning points related to his temper and gambling. The personal voice, emotions, and reflections on these events would be central, revealing his meanings and feelings about what happened and how he experienced the loss of family and stability.
The narrative might include vivid, concrete memories—e.g., moments of anger, gambling episodes, or stressful family interactions—woven with his feelings of abandonment and life on the streets, capturing how he makes sense of his life trajectory. The chronology may not be strictly linear, allowing for thematic or emotional connections.
The interviewer would primarily listen with minimal interruption during the initial storytelling phase, followed by narrative follow-up questions to clarify or expand on key events or emotions. The final narrative would present a deeply personal, coherent story that reveals not just what happened, but how he interprets those experiences and their impact on his identity and life today.
Such a narrative reflects the basic storytelling structure (beginning with context, moving through conflict and actions, ending with consequences and reflections) while honoring the interviewee’s own language, pace, and priorities in recounting his life."
My question 3: "What academic theories would probably be useful to analyze such a narrative as recorded in the narrative interview with practical and academic values to the research theme of homelessness?"
The reply: "To analyze a narrative from a middle-aged homeless man with a complex personal history like the one described, several academic theories and approaches would be especially useful for their practical and scholarly value to homelessness research:
Narrative Analysis Theories: Models by Labov, Gee, and Richardson emphasize close attention to story structure, language, tone, and emphasis, revealing layers of meaning in how the person constructs their identity and experience over time. This method helps uncover implicit meanings behind homelessness narratives and lived experience.
Social Constructionism: Views identity and meaning as constructed through storytelling, enabling analysis of how the interviewee interprets and makes sense of homelessness, family loss, and identity crises in a socio-cultural context.
Turning Points Theory: Focuses on life events perceived as significant changes or transitions. Analysis can highlight critical moments like gambling problems, family breakdown, and becoming homeless, elucidating personal and social factors driving those transitions.
Life Course Perspective: Examines how earlier life experiences and trajectories (e.g., factory management, gambling) cumulatively affect later homelessness and social exclusion, providing a longitudinal lens on social pathologies and resilience.
Social Support and Network Theories: Considering the interviewee’s loss of family and social ties, these theories analyze the role of interpersonal relationships and community connections—or their absence—on homelessness outcomes and recovery potential.
Stigma and Identity Theories: Analyze how homelessness and associated challenges impact self-identity and social stigma, contributing to isolation or crisis of identity highlighted in the narrative.
Critical Realism: Combines ontological realism and epistemological interpretivism to uncover underlying mechanisms and structures (e.g., socio-economic conditions, policy gaps) that interact with individual agency, enriching understanding of homelessness causality [user's prior interests].
Policy and Practice Frameworks: Using narrative insights to inform housing policies, social services, and trauma-informed practice that are sensitive to the nuanced experiences and needs expressed in the lived stories.
These theories enable deep, ethically respectful interpretation of the narrative data, linking personal meaning with wider socio-political realities, guiding interventions that address both individual and structural homelessness factors [user: prior knowledge].
This multi-theoretical approach provides both academic rigor and practical value in homelessness research through narrative interviews."
No comments:
Post a Comment