Lecture note on critical thinking with regard to postmodernism and critical realism: for MBA students
Suggest 3 main ideas from postmodernism and another 3
main ideas from critical realism that enable part-time MBA students to employ
some relatively straightforward way to practice critical thinking in their
dissertation project works. For illustrating your ideas, consider using the
research theme of "an evaluation of employer branding practices on human
resource management performance in the Hong Kong Insurance sector".
Here is a
practical way to use 3 postmodern ideas and 3 critical realist ideas
to sharpen critical thinking in a part-time MBA dissertation, using your theme
on employer branding and HRM performance in the Hong Kong insurance sector.
Postmodernism helps you question taken-for-granted assumptions, while critical
realism helps you move from surface observations to deeper causal explanation.
Postmodern ideas
1.
Distrust of grand
narratives. Postmodernism
challenges universal stories and “one best way” explanations, so you can
question claims such as “strong employer branding always improves HRM
performance”. In your topic, this means asking whether employer branding works
the same way for all insurers, all employees, and all job levels, or whether
the effect varies by context.
2.
Polyvocality. Postmodernism values multiple legitimate
perspectives rather than one authoritative voice. For your dissertation, this
supports comparing views from HR managers, frontline staff, and job applicants,
instead of treating management claims as the full truth.
3.
Self-reflexivity. Postmodernism encourages the researcher to
examine how their own assumptions shape interpretation. A simple dissertation
practice is to write a short reflexive memo after each interview or
data-reading session, noting how your MBA background or expectations about
branding may be influencing your reading of the evidence.
4.
Critical realist
ideas
1.
Reality exists
beyond perception. Critical realism
holds that real structures and mechanisms operate independently of what people
think about them. In your topic, employee perceptions of employer branding
matter, but you would also ask whether underlying HR policies, pay structures,
workload, and promotion systems are actually supporting performance.
2.
Stratified explanation. Critical realism distinguishes between what
is observed and the deeper causes behind it. So if a Hong Kong insurer reports
improved retention after branding campaigns, you would test whether the
improvement came from branding itself or from better compensation, leadership,
or career development hidden underneath.
3.
Judgmental
rationality. Critical realism
accepts that knowledge is fallible, but still allows you to judge some
explanations as better than others. In a dissertation, this becomes a
straightforward discipline: compare rival explanations, look for the one with
the strongest support from interviews, documents, and performance indicators,
and explain why it is more plausible.
4.
Applying to your
theme
A simple
dissertation structure would be: use postmodernism to question assumptions
about employer branding, then use critical realism to explain what really
drives HRM performance in the Hong Kong insurance sector. For example, if
staff say the company has a strong employer brand, a postmodern lens asks whose
version of the brand this is; a critical realist lens then asks what
mechanisms, such as trust, career visibility, or managerial consistency,
actually produce performance outcomes.
You could turn
this into three manageable critical-thinking habits:
- Ask what dominant story is
being told, and who benefits from it.
- Check whose voice is missing
from the evidence.
- Separate visible outcomes
from the deeper causes behind them.
Here are 4 strong academic
references you can use for that topic in Harvard format.
·
Hesketh, A. and Fleetwood, S. (2006) ‘Beyond measuring
the human resources management-organizational performance link: applying
critical realist meta-theory’, Organization,
13(5), pp. 677–699.
·
Parker, M. (1992) ‘Post-modern organizations or
postmodern organization theory?’, Organization
Studies, 13(1), pp. 1–17.
·
Hassard, J., Kelemen, M. and Wolfram Cox, J. (2008)
‘Disorganization theory: Explorations in alternative organizational analysis’, Academy of Management Review,
33(4), pp. 1055–1069.
·
Han, H., Kuchinke, K.P. and Boulay, D.A. (2009)
‘Postmodernism and HRD theory: current status and prospects’, Human Resource Development Review,
8(1), pp. 59–77.
A useful extra one for your
dissertation framing is:
·
Fleetwood, S. (2014) Bhaskar and
critical realism. In: M. Edwards (ed.) The
Oxford Handbook of Critical Realism. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
A collection of blog notes on using chatgpt for research purpose.
No comments:
Post a Comment