Lecture note on research philosophies and the practical value of MBA dissertation projects
In the
context of doing part-time MBA dissertation projects, which primarily is
pragmatic and managerial in orientation, I am told that an MBA dissertation
project is expected to create some practical value (e.g. knowledge with
actionable and managerial value). Thus, I can easily understand why the
research philosophy of pragmatism is relevant for this kind of project. Kindly
suggest to me 2 ways on treating dissertation research findings based on (1)
positivism and (2) interpretivism so as to gain some practical value. To
clarify the discussion, consider to use the example of the crude MBA research
theme of "understanding and enhancing visitors' tour experience in Ocean
Park of Hong Kong during the public holidays".
For a pragmatic, managerial MBA project, you
can treat findings in two different but
complementary ways: as measurable patterns and causal relationships
(positivism), and as situated meanings and narratives (interpretivism). Both
can be turned into practical value for Ocean Park’s management if you are
explicit about how each type of finding translates into concrete decisions and
interventions.[1][2]
Below are two clear ways of “treating” your
findings to gain practical value, using your theme of “understanding and enhancing visitors’ tour experience in Ocean Park of
Hong Kong during public holidays.”
![]()
1. Positivist treatment: patterns → rules →
interventions
Under positivism, you treat your findings as objective, generalizable relationships
between variables that can guide managerial rules, KPIs, and operational
decisions.[1]
Step A: Frame findings as measurable
relationships
Example types of findings in a positivist
Ocean Park study:
·
Crowding and satisfaction
“Perceived crowding score” is negatively associated with overall satisfaction
and intention to revisit, especially during 2–4pm peak hours on public
holidays.
·
Queue time and spending
Average queue time for headline attractions (e.g. major rides) shows a
threshold effect: beyond 45 minutes, reported intention to purchase F&B and
souvenirs drops significantly.
·
Staff interaction quality and Net Promoter
Score (NPS)
A 1‑point increase in “staff helpfulness” rating corresponds to a measurable
increase in NPS and likelihood to recommend Ocean Park to friends.
You present these as statistical patterns (correlations, regressions, differences
between groups) with statements like “Higher perceived crowding is associated
with lower satisfaction” rather than rich stories.[3][1]
Step B: Translate relationships into
actionable management rules
You then treat
the findings as design rules and control levers:
1. Set operational thresholds and KPIs
o Use
findings on crowding and queue time to set KPIs such as:
“During public holidays, 80% of visitors should experience queues under 40
minutes for headline attractions.”
o Monitor
these via real‑time operations dashboards and adjust staffing or ride
scheduling when thresholds are exceeded.
2. Optimize resource allocation and scheduling
o If data
show specific zones (e.g. marine exhibits) are under‑utilized while ride areas
are congested, re‑allocate entertainment shows and characters to congested
zones to distribute flows.
o Use
time‑of‑day patterns to schedule more staff at guest‑services points and
popular rides during peak hours, based on empirical relationships between
staffing, crowding, and satisfaction.[4][5][6]
3. Design experiments for continuous improvement
o Treat
your findings as hypotheses for A/B tests:
For instance, “Implementing a virtual queue system for two rides should
increase overall satisfaction scores by X and increase secondary spending by
Y.”
o Run
controlled trials over several public holidays; measure the change in key
metrics (satisfaction, NPS, per‑capita spending) to confirm or refine the
rules.
4. Prioritize investments and justify business
cases
o If your
data show that reducing queue time at Ride A has a much larger effect on
satisfaction than at Ride B, you can argue for capex investment (e.g. new
loading platform, virtual queue tech) at Ride A first.
o Put
numbers into a simple business case: “A projected 0.3‑point increase in average
satisfaction yields Z% increase in revisit intention; with an average ticket
price of HKD…, this supports an expected revenue uplift of ….”
In
short: Under positivism, you treat findings as evidence‑based rules about “what works”
in a generalizable way, and convert them into KPIs, process changes, and
structured experiments that operational managers can implement.
![]()
2. Interpretivist treatment: meanings →
narratives → design principles
Under interpretivism, you treat findings as context‑dependent meanings and lived
experiences that help managers understand “what it feels like” to be a
visitor and how different segments construct their holiday experience.[2][7][1]
Step A: Frame findings as themes and stories
You would typically collect qualitative data
(e.g. semi‑structured interviews, on‑site ethnographic observation, visitor
diaries) and code them into themes:
Example interpretivist findings at Ocean
Park:
·
Theme: “Holiday family ritual”
Visitors describe Ocean Park as part of a recurring family ritual (“We come
here every Lunar New Year”), emphasizing togetherness, photo‑taking, and shared
memories more than rides per se.
·
Theme: “Being trapped in queues”
Some visitors narrate feeling “trapped” or “wasting my holiday” when queueing,
describing frustration, boredom, and guilt about children getting tired.
·
Theme: “Hong Kong identity and pride”
Local visitors talk about Ocean Park as “our park,” contrasting it with
overseas parks; they describe pride in local marine conservation and local food
options.
·
Theme: “Micro‑moments of magic”
Especially for first‑time visitors, small interactions (a staff member helping
with photos, a surprise character encounter) are described as “the most
memorable part” of the day.
These are not just variables but interpretations of what the experience
means to different segments.[7][3]
Step B: Translate meanings into design and
communication principles
You then treat
the findings as design principles and narrative guidelines for managers:
1. Experience design principles
o From
“holiday family ritual” and “micro‑moments of magic,” derive principles such
as:
“Design the park day as a sequence of memorable family micro‑moments, not just
rides.”
o Concrete
actions: more photo spots with good backdrops; staff trained to offer proactive
family assistance (e.g. volunteer to take family photos, give small souvenirs
to children during peak queuing times).
2. Queue experience re‑framing
o Instead
of only reducing queue length (positivist focus), interpretivist insights
suggest re‑framing the meaning of
queuing:
§ Introduce
interactive queue entertainment (mini‑shows, AR games, educational marine
content).
§ Provide
“parent‑friendly” features (seating, fans, shade, child play corners) so
parents do not feel guilty or stressed.
o The aim
is to shift the narrative from “wasting time” to “part of the shared
adventure.”
3. Segment‑specific storytelling and
communication
o For
local Hong Kong families, emphasize “our park,” conservation stories, and local
culture in communication materials and on‑site signage.
o For
Mainland or overseas visitors, highlight discovery, novelty, and “must‑do”
experiences, connecting their own holiday motives and expectations.
o These
narrative strategies are grounded in how different segments interpret their visit (“family ritual,”
“status trip,” “children’s reward,” etc.).
4. Staff training and scripts based on visitor
meanings
o Use
typical visitor stories in staff training:
§ Show
how a small act (e.g. helping a lost guest) becomes the highlight of someone’s
day.
§ Discuss
how certain phrases or attitudes can either affirm visitors’ holiday narratives
(“You’ve picked the perfect day for your family adventure!”) or undermine them
(“It’s always crowded, what do you expect?”).
o Develop
interaction scripts that reinforce
positive narratives (family bonding, pride, discovery) and de‑escalate negative
ones (feeling trapped, disrespected).
5. Reflexive policy and inclusion
o Interpretivist
work also encourages managers to reflect on whose experience is being privileged.
o For
example, stories from visitors with disabilities or elderly grandparents may
reveal that the park design implicitly centers able‑bodied younger adults; this
can guide inclusive design changes (wheelchair‑friendly routes, resting points,
clearer signage).
In
short: Under interpretivism, you treat findings as rich accounts of how visitors make sense of
their day, and convert these into experience design principles, narrative
strategies, training content, and inclusion policies.
![]()
Putting both approaches to practical use
For a pragmatic MBA dissertation, you can explicitly show how both treatments create
value:
·
In your positivist chapters, emphasize:
o Clear
variables (crowding, queue time, satisfaction, spending).
o Statistical
relationships.
o KPIs,
resource allocation decisions, and experiment plans derived from those
relationships.
·
In your interpretivist or qualitative
chapters, emphasize:
o Visitor
meanings and narratives (how different segments experience and interpret Ocean
Park).
o Design
and communication principles.
o Staff
training, inclusive policies, and experience re‑framing grounded in those
narratives.
A very nice, pragmatic position for your
dissertation is to say:
“Positivist
analysis tells Ocean Park management where
and when experiences are weak and
which operational levers matter most; interpretivist analysis tells them why visitors feel as they do and how interventions can be designed to
align with visitors’ own meanings and holiday narratives.”
** a collection of lecture notes on research methods