Lecture note on qualitative research methods design quality: for MBA students

Lecture note on qualitative research methods design quality: for MBA students

Highlight 3 main qualitative research methods design criteria and offer 3 practice advices on how to improve the qualitative research methods design in the context of doing a part-time MBA dissertation project.

For a qualitative MBA dissertation, the three main design criteria are credibility, transferability, and confirmability. In practice, these are the most useful standards for judging whether your study is trustworthy and well designed.

Three design criteria

·        Credibility: Your findings should reflect participants’ experiences and meanings accurately, which depends on clear objectives, appropriate data collection, and a data analysis process that fits the research purpose.

·        Transferability: You should describe the context, participants, and setting clearly enough that readers can judge whether the findings may apply to similar MBA or business contexts.

·        Confirmability: Your conclusions should be traceable to the data rather than your personal bias, so the design should show how interpretations were developed and how researcher influence was managed.

Three practical improvements

·        Align research questions tightly with the method: Make sure each question can realistically be answered through interviews, focus groups, or case study evidence, and avoid questions that are too broad for a part-time dissertation timeline.

·        Build transparency into the process: Document your sampling, interview guide, coding steps, and theme development so your reasoning is easy to follow and your findings are easier to defend.

·        Use practical quality checks: Do member checking where possible, keep a reflexive memo on your assumptions, and use a clear audit trail so your study stays credible and confirmable.

MBA dissertation application

For a part-time MBA project, the biggest risk is not theory but scope and feasibility. A strong qualitative design usually comes from a narrow topic, a small but relevant sample, and a method that fits your access to participants and time constraints. A simple rule is: if you cannot explain how your data will answer the question in a few sentences, the design is probably too wide.

 

Please clarify your ideas a bit with regard to the MBA dissertation research theme of "to evaluate the influence of corporate culture on the middle-managers' innovation behavior in ABC Hotel Ltd of Hong Kong via the lens of interpretivism, using semi-structured interview and participant observation".

Your topic is already well aligned with an interpretivist MBA dissertation: you want to understand how corporate culture shapes middle managers’ innovation behavior in a specific hotel, not to measure a numeric effect. Below, I clarify the key ideas and show how the three design criteria and three improvement tips fit your theme.

How the design criteria apply to your study

·        Credibility: You will achieve credibility by ensuring your interpretations of “corporate culture” and “innovation behavior” reflect middle managers’ own meanings and experiences. Using both semi-structured interviews and participant observation helps you triangulate what people say with what you observe in daily work, making your findings more trustworthy.

·        Transferability: You will describe ABC Hotel Ltd’s context in detail (e.g., organizational structure, customer service model, management style, and Hong Kong hospitality context) so readers can judge whether your insights might apply to similar hotels or service firms in Hong Kong or elsewhere.

·        Confirmability: You will keep an audit trail of your interview questions, observation notes, coding decisions, and theme development, showing how you moved from raw data to conclusions about culture and innovation. This makes your reasoning transparent and reduces the risk that findings are just your own bias.

Clarifying the interpretivist lens

Interpretivism assumes that:

·        Social reality (like corporate culture) is constructed through people’s meanings, interactions, and narratives.

·        There is no single “true” culture; instead, there are multiple, sometimes conflicting, interpretations of culture among staff and managers.

·        Your role is to understand and interpret these meanings, not to test a fixed hypothesis.

In your study, this means:

·        You will treat “corporate culture” as something middle managers experience and interpret (e.g., as supportive, controlling, risk-averse, or innovative), not as a pre-defined variable.

·        You will treat “innovation behavior” as managers’ own understanding of what counts as innovative (e.g., new service ideas, process improvements, problem-solving approaches), not just as a count of implemented projects.

·        Your analysis will focus on patterns in how managers describe and enact culture and innovation, and on the contexts that make certain behaviors more likely.

Clarifying the methods in your design

Semi-structured interviews

·        You will prepare an interview guide with open questions such as:

·        “How do you describe the culture at ABC Hotel Ltd?”

·        “What kinds of new ideas or changes have you tried in your role, and what influenced you to do that?”

·        “In what ways does the organization support or discourage innovation?”

·        The semi-structured format lets you follow interesting topics while still covering key themes across participants.

·        You will interview a small number of middle managers (e.g., 8–12) who are directly involved in guest services, operations, or departmental management.

Participant observation

·        You will observe middle managers in their natural work setting (e.g., daily briefings, service coordination, problem-solving with staff, handling guest issues).

·        You will note:

·        How managers communicate with staff and each other.

·        When and how they introduce new ideas or changes.

·        Reactions from others (support, resistance, indifference).

·        Moments where culture seems to enable or constrain innovation.

·        Observation notes will complement interview data, helping you see whether what managers say matches what they do.

How the three practical improvements fit your theme

1.    Align research questions tightly with the method
Frame questions that are naturally answered through words and meanings, not numbers, such as:

·        “How do middle managers in ABC Hotel Ltd interpret the influence of corporate culture on their innovation behavior?”

·        “In what ways do middle managers describe corporate culture as supporting or constraining their innovation behavior?”
These fit interviews and observation, and are feasible for a part-time MBA dissertation.

2.    Build transparency into the process

·        Document your sampling criteria (e.g., middle managers with at least X years at ABC Hotel, in specific departments).

·        Keep your interview guide and show how you adjusted it based on early interviews.

·        Record your coding process: initial codes, how you grouped them into themes, and examples of data that支持 each theme.
This makes your analysis clear and defensible.

3.    Use practical quality checks

·        Where possible, do simple member checking: share a summary of your interpretation with a few participants and ask if it reflects their experience.

·        Keep reflexive memos about your own assumptions (e.g., your views on hotel culture, innovation, or management) and how they might influence your interpretation.

·        Maintain an audit trail so your conclusions about culture and innovation are clearly linked to specific interview quotes and observation notes.

Feasibility and scope for a part-time MBA

To keep the project realistic:

·        Focus on one company (ABC Hotel Ltd) and one level (middle managers).

·        Limit your sample to a manageable number of participants (e.g., 8–12).

·        Set a clear observation period (e.g., 4–6 weeks) with a defined number of observation sessions.

·        Define “innovation behavior” in your own operational terms early (e.g., “any attempt by a middle manager to introduce new or improved service practices, processes, or ideas that go beyond routine tasks”).

This keeps the study deep enough for interpretivism but narrow enough to complete within a part-time MBA timeline.

** A collection of lecture notes on the subject of research methods for MBA students, 2026 June

A collection of blog notes on using chatgpt for research purpose.

A discussion of research types using an MBA research theme of “low-pressure getaways”

A discussion of research types using an MBA research theme of “low-pressure getaways”

 

Regarding the topic of research types, if my MBA dissertation research theme is "to evaluate the service quality and customer experience of low-pressure getaways in Hong Kong", is it descriptive research, exploratory research or evaluation research? Of considering the research theme as different research types mean the formulated research objectives and research question will differ?

Your MBA dissertation theme “to evaluate the service quality and customer experience of low-pressure getaways in Hong Kong” is primarily evaluation research (also called evaluative research), not purely descriptive or exploratory research.

Why it’s evaluation research

Research Type	Main Purpose	Matches Your Theme?
Evaluation research	Assess the effectiveness, quality, or value of a program/service/experience; judge against criteria	✅ Yes — you’re explicitly evaluating service quality and customer experience
Descriptive research	Describe “what exists” — characteristics, current status, who/what/when/where/how	❌ Only partially — you’d need to describe features first, but your goal goes beyond description
Exploratory research	Gain initial insights when little is known; develop hypotheses rather than test them	❌ No — service quality and customer experience are well-studied concepts; you’re not exploring an unknown phenomenon

Evaluation research is a type of applied research designed to assess the effectiveness of social or economic programs/services. Since you’re judging service quality and customer experience (likely against standards or expectations), this is evaluative.

---

Yes — research type affects objectives and questions

The research type you choose directly shapes your research objectives and research questions:

Research Type	Typical Research Objective	Typical Research Question
Evaluation	Assess/judge the effectiveness/quality of X against criteria	“How effective is X?” / “What is the quality of X, and does it meet standards?”
Descriptive	Describe characteristics/status of X	“What are the characteristics of X?” / “What exists regarding X?”
Exploratory	Gain initial understanding; develop hypotheses	“What is happening with X?” / “What factors might influence X?”

For your theme as evaluation research, your objectives and questions would look like:

Research Objective Example:

·        To evaluate the service quality and customer experience of low-pressure getaways in Hong Kong against established service quality dimensions (e.g., reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy, tangibles).

Research Question Example:

·        What is the level of service quality and customer experience at low-pressure getaways in Hong Kong, and do they meet expected standards?

·        Which service quality dimensions most strongly influence customer experience at these getaways?

If you framed it as descriptive research, your question would be:

·        “What are the current service quality characteristics and customer experience features of low-pressure getaways in Hong Kong?”

If exploratory:

·        “What factors influence service quality and customer experience at low-pressure getaways in Hong Kong, and what hypotheses can be developed for future study?”

---

Practical recommendation for your MBA dissertation

Since your explicit aim is to evaluate, you should:

1.    Anchor your dissertation in evaluation research

2.    Use established service quality frameworks (e.g., SERVQUAL) as evaluation criteria

3.    Formulate objectives/questions that assess performance against those criteria

4.    Consider including descriptive elements (e.g., describing current service features) as part of your evaluation process, but keep evaluation as your primary type

This alignment ensures your research design, methodology, and analysis match your stated purpose — a key requirement for MBA dissertation quality.

** A collection of lecture notes on the subject of research methods for MBA students, 2026 June

A collection of blog notes on using chatgpt for research purpose.