A note on qualitative data analysis: for Housing Studies students
Highlight 4 main ideas of the following
qualitative data analysis methods in Housing Studies. Also provide a few simple
examples to illustrate the 4 main ideas of each of these methods:
1. thematic
analysis
2. content
analysis
3. narrative
analysis
In Housing
Studies, these three methods all analyse qualitative material—such as tenant
interviews, resident focus groups, housing-policy documents, or community
consultation records—but they ask different questions: thematic analysis
looks for shared patterns of meaning; content analysis systematically
classifies and often counts what appears in texts; narrative analysis
interprets people’s stories and how experiences unfold over time.
1. Thematic analysis
Thematic analysis
identifies, analyses, and reports recurring patterns or “themes” in qualitative
data; it can be data-driven (inductive) or theory-driven (deductive).
|
Main idea |
Meaning |
Housing Studies example |
|
Coding
meaningful segments |
Break interview
text into meaningful units and label them. |
In interviews
with public-housing tenants, “long waiting time,” “poor maintenance,” and “no
lift access” are coded as separate issues. |
|
Grouping codes
into themes |
Combine related
codes into broader themes. |
Codes such as
“leaking pipes,” “broken lifts,” and “slow repair” form the theme inadequate
estate management. |
|
Identifying
latent meaning |
Look beyond
literal words for underlying meanings. |
Tenants
repeatedly say “we are not heard”; the latent theme may be powerlessness
in housing governance. |
|
Relating themes
to the research question |
Explain how
themes answer the study’s aims and connect with one another. |
The theme inadequate
estate management may interact with low income to explain why
residents feel trapped in poor-quality housing. |
Simple
illustration: If 15 tenants
describe safety concerns, a thematic analysis would not merely count “safety”;
it would develop themes such as fear of crime, poor lighting, and
lack of security staff, then explain how these together shape residents’
sense of insecurity.
2. Content analysis
Content analysis systematically codes and categorises text to identify concepts, patterns, frequencies, relationships, and communication structures; it may use manifest content (explicit words/categories) or latent content (underlying meaning).
|
Main idea |
Meaning |
Housing Studies example |
|
Systematic
classification |
Use clear
categories applied consistently across documents or transcripts. |
Code Housing
Authority consultation submissions into “affordability,” “waiting time,”
“estate facilities,” and “location.” |
|
Counting or
comparing occurrences |
Record how often
categories appear, where relevant. |
Find that “rent
burden” appears in 40 of 60 submissions, while “estate cleanliness” appears
in 12. |
|
Analysing
manifest or latent content |
Examine either
explicit wording or implied meanings. |
Manifest: the
word “overcrowding” appears frequently. Latent: complaints about “children
having nowhere to study” imply overcrowding. |
|
Examining
context and relationships |
Consider who
says what, to whom, and with what effect. |
Compare whether
tenants, landlords, and officials use different language when discussing
“affordable housing.” |
Simple
illustration: In analysing 30
newspaper articles on subdivided flats, you might code each article for “safety
hazards,” “rent levels,” “government regulation,” and “tenant rights,” then
report that safety hazards are the most frequently discussed category.
3. Narrative analysis
Narrative analysis focuses on the stories people tell: how events are sequenced, what the story means to the teller, and how social and cultural contexts shape its telling.
|
Main idea |
Meaning |
Housing Studies example |
|
Understanding
lived experience as a story |
Treat an
interview account as a story with a beginning, middle, and end. |
A tenant
explains moving from a private subdivided flat to public housing as a journey
from insecurity to stability. |
|
Examining time
and sequence |
Analyse how
past, present, and future events are ordered. |
A resident
recounts applying for housing, waiting years, being offered a flat, and
adapting to estate life. |
|
Interpreting
plot, turning points, and meaning |
Identify key
events that change the person’s situation or self-understanding. |
Receiving a
public-housing allocation is a turning point that changes a family’s sense of
security and future plans. |
|
Recognising
social context and voice |
Consider how
identity, audience, culture, and power influence the narrative. |
An elderly
tenant may frame relocation as “being moved by the government,” highlighting
limited control over housing decisions. |
Simple
illustration: Rather than
coding all mentions of “waiting,” narrative analysis would follow one
applicant’s story: initial hope, repeated disappointment, family stress, then
relief after allocation. The focus is on how the waiting period is experienced
and given meaning, not simply how often it is mentioned.
Quick distinction
- Thematic
analysis: “What shared patterns of meaning appear
across participants?”
- Content
analysis: “What categories, words, or concepts occur,
how often, and in what context?”
- Narrative
analysis: “How does this person construct and give
meaning to their housing experience over time?”
No comments:
Post a Comment