Article review of “The effects of cloud technology on management accounting”: for advanced management accounting study
How to present the reference of this article
in Harvard reference format?
Strauss, E., Kristandl, G. & Quinn,
M., 2015. The effects of cloud technology on management accounting and decision
making. Research Executive Summary Series, 10(6). Chartered Institute of
Management Accountants, London. Available at: [URL if available] [Accessed
date].
What are the key research issues the article
wants to address?
The article
identifies the following key research issues it aims to address:
·
To explore the reasons why
businesses adopt or do not adopt cloud technology.
·
To assess the extent of cloud
technology use in finance, management accounting, and similar systems.
·
To establish how cloud
technology affects the provision of decision-making information, particularly
focusing on information format and any change in the role of the management
accountant in providing information.
These research objectives are
outlined to gain initial insights on how cloud computing affects management
accounting and decision making, addressing a gap in the existing literature on
the subject.
What research methods have been used in this
study?
The study used a
mixed methods research approach, combining the following methods:
1.
Literature Review: The
researchers conducted a review of information technology literature to gain
foundational knowledge about cloud technology, its benefits, and challenges.
2.
Expert Interviews: Three
interviews were conducted with technology experts:
·
A founder/managing director of
a cloud storage solution provider (technical expert).
·
A founder/managing director of
a technology firm that uses and sells cloud technology.
·
A sales manager from a leading
accounting software provider offering both traditional desktop and cloud-based
software. These interviews provided technical insights and practical
perspectives on cloud technology adoption.
3.
Survey: Based on the findings
from literature and interviews, a survey was designed targeting primarily small
and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The survey was sent to members of the
Controller Panel at WHU Otto Beisheim School of Management, Germany, which
consists mainly of heads of controlling. Out of 182 contacted, 139 responses
were received (76% response rate), covering a broad range of industries with
over 90% of firms classified as SMEs.
This mixed methods
approach aimed to gather both qualitative and quantitative data to explore cloud
technology usage in management accounting thoroughly.
Describe two main theories employed in this
study.
The study does not explicitly state specific
named theories employed but references key theoretical perspectives and
concepts that underpin the research:
1. Technology Adoption and Change Theory: The
study is grounded on the idea that advances in information technology drive
changes in management accounting and decision-making processes. This is
supported by references to prior research indicating that technological
progress is a key force influencing management accounting practices (e.g.,
Scapens et al., 2003; Dechow et al., 2007). The notion of cloud computing as a
utility model providing on-demand, scalable resources aligns with theories of
technology adoption that focus on perceived benefits, risks (such as data
security), and organizational readiness affecting uptake.
2. Information and Management Control Theory:
The interaction between information technology and management control systems
is another theoretical foundation cited. For example, Dechow, Granlund, and
Mouritsen (2007) emphasize the relationship between IT and management control
practices. This relates to how cloud technology affects information provision
for decision making, information formats, and the management accountant's
role—highlighting the theory that information systems influence managerial
control and decision-making structures.
Thus, although not named as "main
theories," these perspectives form the theoretical basis for understanding
cloud technology's influence on management accounting and decision making in
the study.
Highlight 3 main empirical findings of this
article.
The three main empirical findings of the
study are:
1.
Low Adoption of Cloud Technology in Finance
and Management Accounting Systems:
Only about 25% of respondent firms have adopted cloud technology for business
systems beyond common uses like email. Within this group, finance and
management accounting systems are the least likely to use cloud technology
compared to other areas such as CRM and other business processes.
2.
Data Security Concerns as the Primary
Barrier to Adoption: The
overwhelming reason for not adopting cloud technology is concern over data
security and protection. Despite technology experts suggesting that cloud
providers often offer more robust security than typical SME configurations,
businesses remain wary, indicating a gap in understanding or communication
about actual security benefits.
3.
Cloud Technology Improves Decision Making
but Collaboration Gains Are Limited: An overwhelming 93% of respondents agreed that cloud
technology has contributed positively to decision making, with 32% stating it
improved decision making compared to previous systems. However, the expected
collaborative advantage is less than anticipated, with 77% reporting no
significant change in the level of involvement in decision making using cloud
technology versus previous systems.
These findings highlight the
current state of cloud adoption in management accounting, the barriers faced,
and the impact on decision-making practices
Describe 2 main claims of the article in
terms of Toulmin's model of argument.
Using Toulmin's
model of argument, two main claims of the article can be described as follows:
1.
Claim 1: Cloud
computing offers significant advantages for management accounting and
decision-making, but adoption in finance processes is limited primarily due to
data security concerns.
·
Grounds
(Evidence): Survey results show only 25%
of firms have adopted cloud technology for business systems, with finance and
management accounting systems least likely to use it. Data security concerns
were identified as the primary reason for non-adoption, despite technology
experts asserting cloud security can be stronger than typical SME systems.
·
Warrant
(Reasoning): Because cloud computing can
deliver cost savings, scalability, ease of administration, and flexible access
to information, its advantages should encourage adoption. However, concerns
over security act as a barrier that limits uptake in finance-related systems.
·
Backing: Interviews with technology experts confirm both
the advantages of cloud computing and that most firms default to private or
hybrid clouds to mitigate security concerns. The literature also supports cloud
computing advantages and security features.
2.
Claim 2: Cloud
technology improves access to decision-making information and contributes
positively to decision making, but the collaborative advantage is less realized
than expected.
·
Grounds
(Evidence): 93% of respondents agree
cloud technology contributes to decision making; 32% say it improves
decision-making compared to prior systems. However, 77% report the level of
involvement in decision making (collaboration) remains the same compared to
earlier systems.
·
Warrant
(Reasoning): Cloud technology's ubiquitous
access and mixed graphical/numeric reporting formats simplify information
provision and access, enabling better decision making. Yet organizational and
cultural factors may limit increased collaboration.
·
Backing: Survey data show most cloud access occurs on
corporate devices during regular hours, with less use of personal or mobile
devices, indicating limited change in physical or temporal decision-making
contexts.
These claims integrate
evidence, reasoning, and contextual support to argue both the potential
benefits and the current limitations of cloud technology in management
accounting
Describe 2 main research limitations of the
study.
Two main research limitations of the study
are:
1.
Sample Composition and Size: The study’s survey largely involved small
and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), with over 90% of respondents classified as
SMEs, primarily from Germany and surrounding regions through the Controller
Panel at WHU Otto Beisheim School of Management. This limits the generalizability
of the findings to larger firms or firms in other countries where cloud
adoption and cultural work practices may differ significantly.
2.
Exploratory Nature and Depth of Analysis: The research was exploratory with a
relatively small sample size (139 responses) and limited qualitative data on
how cloud technology specifically affects the evolving role of management
accountants and detailed decision-making processes. The study did not provide
in-depth accounts or longitudinal analysis, thus restricting insights into
long-term impacts or detailed transformational changes arising from cloud
adoption.
These limitations suggest that further
research is needed to examine diverse organizational contexts, larger samples,
and deeper qualitative inquiry into the evolving implications of cloud
technology for management accounting.
No comments:
Post a Comment