A study note on purposive and theoretical sampling in qualitative research

A study note on purposive and theoretical sampling in qualitative research (information from perplexity.ai)

My question 1: "What are purposive and theoretical sampling in qualitative research all about with reference to (1) business management and (2) housing studies?"

The reply: "Purposive and theoretical sampling are two qualitative research sampling techniques that serve different but complementary roles in understanding complex social phenomena. Below is an explanation of each method with specific reference to their application in (1) business management and (2) housing studies.

Purposive Sampling

Definition and General Use:

Purposive sampling is a non-random, judgmental sampling technique where participants or units are deliberately selected based on specific characteristics or criteria relevant to the research question. This method is used when the researcher has a clear purpose and wants to focus on particular subgroups or cases that can provide rich, relevant data135.

In Business Management:

Purposive sampling is widely used in business and management research to select individuals or organizations that have specific knowledge, experience, or characteristics related to the study’s focus. For example, researchers studying leadership styles in multinational corporations might purposively select executives from diverse cultural backgrounds to ensure the sample reflects the complexity of the target population. This targeted approach enhances the depth and quality of insights, making it easier to uncover patterns and test theories relevant to strategic leadership, organizational resilience, or other management phenomena3. It is valued for its efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and ability to focus on cases that provide detailed insights into complex business issues3.

In Housing Studies:

While purposive sampling is less explicitly detailed in the housing studies literature, it can be inferred that researchers use this method to select participants or cases that reflect particular housing conditions, policy impacts, or social groups affected by housing issues. For instance, researchers might purposively sample residents in affordable housing projects or those experiencing homelessness to explore specific lived experiences and policy outcomes. This approach allows housing researchers to gather nuanced data on social and economic factors influencing housing, which might be overlooked in broader, random samples6.

Theoretical Sampling

Definition and General Use:

Theoretical sampling is a dynamic, iterative qualitative sampling method primarily used in grounded theory research. It involves collecting and analyzing data simultaneously, with emerging insights guiding the selection of subsequent data sources. The goal is to develop and refine a theory grounded in the data rather than testing a pre-existing hypothesis. This method is flexible and evolves as the research progresses, allowing for deeper understanding of complex interactions and behaviors24.

In Business Management:

In business management research, theoretical sampling can be employed to explore evolving organizational phenomena, such as innovation processes or leadership dynamics. Researchers start with broad questions and collect data from initial cases; as patterns emerge, they purposively seek additional cases or data that challenge or elaborate the developing theory. This approach helps in building robust, context-sensitive theories that explain how business practices or organizational behaviors unfold in real-world settings24.

In Housing Studies:

Theoretical sampling is particularly relevant in housing studies where understanding complex social processes and policy impacts requires theory development grounded in empirical data. Given the critique that much housing research has been overly empirical and a-theoretical, theoretical sampling offers a way to develop nuanced theories about housing issues by iteratively collecting data from diverse stakeholders (e.g., residents, policymakers, developers) and refining concepts as insights emerge. This method supports addressing the complexity of housing policy and social dynamics, bridging the gap between theory and policy relevance46.

Summary Table

In conclusion, purposive sampling is about deliberately selecting cases with specific characteristics to gain detailed insights, widely used in business management for focused studies and applicable in housing research for targeted exploration. Theoretical sampling, on the other hand, is a flexible, theory-driven approach that evolves through data collection and analysis, crucial for developing grounded theories in both fields to understand complex social and organizational phenomena12346."

My question 2: "What are the challenges of employing these two sampling methods for a part-time student doing dissertation project?"

The reply: "For a part-time student conducting a dissertation project, employing purposive and theoretical sampling in qualitative research presents several practical and methodological challenges:

Challenges of Purposive Sampling

• Subjectivity and Researcher Bias: Purposive sampling relies heavily on the researcher's judgment to select participants who are most relevant to the research question. This subjective selection can introduce bias, potentially favoring certain perspectives while overlooking others, which may limit the diversity and completeness of the data collected23.

• Limited Generalizability: Because purposive sampling is not random and focuses on specific cases, the findings may not be representative of the broader population. This can be a concern when trying to justify the relevance or applicability of the results beyond the sample studied23.

• Difficulty in Justifying Sample Selection: Part-time students may find it challenging to convincingly defend their purposive sampling decisions, especially when readers or examiners question the appropriateness of the chosen cases or participants. Clear, theory-based criteria for selection are necessary but can be hard to develop and articulate for novice researchers3.

• Resource Constraints: Although purposive sampling aims to use limited resources efficiently, part-time students might struggle with finding and accessing the right participants within their limited time and availability, especially if the target group is niche or hard to reach12.

Challenges of Theoretical Sampling

• Complexity and Lack of Clear Guidance: Theoretical sampling is an iterative and emergent process tied closely to grounded theory methodology. It requires simultaneous data collection and analysis, with the sample evolving as the theory develops. Part-time students, often with limited research experience and time, may find this process confusing and difficult to manage without extensive guidance4.

• Uncertainty in Sample Size and Direction: Unlike purposive sampling, theoretical sampling does not start with a fixed sample size or predetermined participants. The researcher must remain flexible and responsive to emerging data, which can be challenging for part-time students balancing research with other commitments4.

• Need for Detailed Documentation: Theoretical sampling demands thorough explanation and justification of sampling decisions as the study progresses. Novice researchers may struggle to document this evolving process clearly, which is critical for establishing credibility and rigor in the research4.

• Risk of Inadequate Sampling and Theory Gaps: Incomplete or poorly executed theoretical sampling can lead to a fragmented or shallow theory. Part-time students may find it difficult to reach theoretical saturation-the point where no new relevant data emerge-within their limited timeframe4.

In essence, part-time students face the dual challenge of managing the methodological rigor required by these sampling methods while coping with limited time, experience, and resources. Careful planning, clear criteria for participant selection, and ongoing reflection and documentation are essential to mitigate these challenges and produce credible qualitative research."

My question 3: "What are the main data analysis methods to use to analyze the sample data of these two sampling methods?"

The reply: "The main data analysis methods used to analyze sample data obtained through purposive and theoretical sampling in qualitative research are closely aligned with the goals and nature of these sampling approaches.

Data Analysis Methods for Purposive Sampling

Purposive sampling is designed to collect rich, in-depth data from information-rich cases selected deliberately for their relevance to the research question. The data analysis methods commonly used include:

• Thematic Analysis:
  This is a flexible and widely used method where researchers identify, analyze, and report patterns (themes) within the data. It suits purposive sampling well because it helps to extract meaningful insights from selected participants who share specific characteristics or experiences, such as leaders in business or residents in particular housing contexts124.

• Content Analysis:
  This method involves systematically coding textual data to quantify and interpret the presence of certain words, themes, or concepts. It is useful when the researcher wants to examine the frequency and context of specific ideas within purposively selected cases.

• Narrative Analysis:
  When the purposive sample consists of individuals with unique or critical experiences (e.g., business executives or housing policy beneficiaries), narrative analysis helps explore how participants construct and communicate their experiences.

• Framework Analysis:
  This structured approach is suitable when the researcher has predefined themes or concepts based on theory or prior research, allowing systematic comparison across purposively selected cases.

These methods help to deeply understand the phenomena represented by the purposive sample, focusing on the quality and richness of data rather than representativeness124.

Data Analysis Methods for Theoretical Sampling

Theoretical sampling is iterative and closely integrated with grounded theory methodology, where data collection and analysis occur simultaneously to develop or refine a theory. The primary data analysis methods include:

• Grounded Theory Analysis:
  This is the hallmark method for theoretical sampling. It involves open coding (breaking down data into discrete parts), axial coding (linking codes into categories), and selective coding (integrating categories into a coherent theory). The analysis is recursive, with emerging concepts guiding further data collection35.

• Constant Comparative Method:
  Researchers continuously compare new data with existing codes and categories to refine concepts and ensure the emerging theory is grounded in the data. This method supports the iterative nature of theoretical sampling by informing sampling decisions in real time5.

• Memo Writing:
  Throughout the analysis, researchers write memos to capture insights, hypotheses, and reflections that help develop and connect theoretical concepts. This practice is integral to managing the complexity of theoretical sampling.

• Theoretical Coding:
  After initial coding, theoretical coding integrates and relates categories to form a substantive theory explaining the studied phenomenon.

These methods emphasize theory development and require ongoing interaction between data collection and analysis, making them distinct from more static analysis approaches used in purposive sampling35.

In conclusion, purposive sampling data are typically analyzed using thematic or content-based methods that emphasize rich description and interpretation of selected cases. Theoretical sampling data require grounded theory methods that support iterative, theory-driven analysis closely linked to ongoing sampling decisions. Both approaches prioritize depth and contextual understanding but differ in their analytic focus and process."

A collection of blog notes on using chatgpt for research purpose.