A study note on peer group learning for students doing dissertation projects

A study note on peer group learning for students doing dissertation projects (information from poe.com)

My question 1: "Many of my part-time MBA students like to form study group for peer group learning purpose. Please advise what specific activities and methods they can use with reference to doing their dissertation project purpose? Tks."

The reply: "Here are several activities and methods that MBA students can use in their study groups to support their dissertation projects:

1. Literature Review Discussions

• Activity: Each member can present a summary of relevant articles or papers they’ve read.
• Method: Use a shared document to compile key points and insights.

2. Brainstorming Sessions

• Activity: Hold focused meetings to brainstorm dissertation topics or research questions.
• Method: Use mind mapping tools to visualize ideas and connections.

3. Peer Review

• Activity: Exchange drafts of dissertation sections for feedback.
• Method: Create a checklist for constructive criticism focusing on clarity, coherence, and argument strength.

4. Guest Speakers

• Activity: Invite professors or industry professionals to discuss their research or relevant topics.
• Method: Prepare questions in advance to maximize the value of the session.

5. Research Methodology Workshops

• Activity: Conduct workshops on different research methods and techniques.
• Method: Use case studies to illustrate methodologies and their applications.

6. Presentation Practice

• Activity: Practice dissertation defense presentations.
• Method: Provide feedback on delivery, content, and handling questions.

7. Time Management Planning

• Activity: Help each other set deadlines and milestones for different dissertation stages.
• Method: Use Gantt charts or shared calendars to track progress.

8. Data Collection Techniques

• Activity: Discuss and plan data collection methods (surveys, interviews, etc.).
• Method: Role-play interviews or survey administration to refine skills.

9. Networking Opportunities

• Activity: Attend academic conferences or networking events together.
• Method: Share contacts and follow up on potential collaborations.

10. Resource Sharing

• Activity: Create a shared repository of useful resources (articles, databases, tools).
• Method: Use cloud storage platforms for easy access.

11. Regular Check-Ins

• Activity: Schedule weekly or bi-weekly meetings to discuss progress and challenges.
• Method: Rotate the facilitator role to ensure engagement.

By incorporating these activities and methods, students can enhance their learning experience and effectively support each other throughout their dissertation projects."

My question 2: "What are the pros and cons of their Research Methods lecturers or dissertation project supervisors participating in some of their peer group meeting sessions? What could be the contribution of the lecturers or supervisors in this case?"

The reply: "Here are the pros and cons of having Research Methods lecturers or dissertation project supervisors participate in peer group meetings, along with their potential contributions:

Pros

1. Expert Guidance

   • Contribution: Lecturers can provide expert insights on research methodologies, helping students refine their approaches.

2. Clarification of Concepts

   • Contribution: They can clarify complex concepts and answer specific questions that arise during discussions.

3. Enhanced Accountability

   • Contribution: Their presence may encourage students to stay focused and disciplined in their work.

4. Networking Opportunities

   • Contribution: Supervisors can connect students with additional resources, contacts, or opportunities in their field.

5. Real-World Insights

   • Contribution: Lecturers can share practical applications of research methods, enhancing theoretical learning with real-world examples.

6. Feedback on Ideas

   • Contribution: They can provide immediate feedback on ideas and research questions, helping students pivot if necessary.

Cons

1. Intimidation Factor

   • Challenge: Students may feel intimidated to express their ideas freely, limiting open discussion.

2. Dependency

   • Challenge: Students might become overly reliant on their supervisors for direction, stifling independent thinking.

3. Time Constraints

   • Challenge: Supervisors may have limited time, which could restrict their availability and the depth of engagement.

4. Power Dynamics

   • Challenge: The presence of a lecturer may create a hierarchical atmosphere, making it difficult for students to critique or challenge ideas.

5. Disruption of Group Dynamics

   • Challenge: The dynamics of peer discussions might change, potentially affecting the group’s comfort and openness.

Potential Contributions of Lecturers/Supervisors

• Facilitating Discussions: Guiding conversations to ensure all voices are heard and that discussions remain productive.
• Providing Resources: Sharing relevant literature, tools, and resources that can aid in research.
• Encouraging Collaboration: Fostering a collaborative environment where students can share ideas and feedback freely.
• Offering Career Advice: Sharing insights about academic and industry opportunities related to their fields of study.

In summary, while there are significant benefits to having lecturers or supervisors involved, it’s essential to balance their presence to maintain an open, collaborative environment for students."

A collection of blog notes on using chatgpt for research purpose.