Based on global shareholder capitalism logic, adoption of GSIs shifts financial capital from poorly managed firms to well managed ones. This implies good use of capital. Participation of foreign capital in a country, especially in a developing country, will lead to more transfer of technologies and well-class management practices in the local enterprises in a developing country. In short, GSIs are good for a country's economic health. The underlying rationales of GSI have been challenged by some academics; the experiences of certain Asian countries with GSI practices, e.g. South Korea, do not support the ideas of GSIs. It has been said that GSIs could lead to social/ economic instability, as well as economic stagnation.
I think the discussion of GSIs remains highly relevant for the discussion of economic policies in 2011. For example, we could discuss to what extent China should adopt certain GSIs in view of its current (and future) role(s) in the global economy. Thus Global Business Management students should study this key topic seriously.
References
- On neoliberalism: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism
- Shin, J.S. (editor) (2007) Global Challenges and Local Responses: The East Asian Experience, Routledge.
I’m so glad I found this site…Keep up the good work I read a lot of blogs on a daily basis and for the most part, people lack substance but, I just wanted to make a quick comment to say GREAT blog. In your next post, provide the Top Colleges in India, so that students come to know about the colleges. Thank for the sharing.
ReplyDelete