Lecture note on research ethics issues and advices: for Housing Studies students
Regarding Hong Kong part-time Housing Studies students doing dissertation projects, please suggest 2 main research ethics issues likely to be encountered and suggest 2 practice advices to the students with reference to the following research method cases:
1.Conducting online questionnaire survey to friends to learn their opinions on the Housing Policy of Hong Kong in 2026.
2. Conducting participant observation to study perceptions of residential quality of the elderly residents in the Public Estate in Tsuen Wan, Hong Kong
3. Conducting semi-structured interview to learn the views of the domestic violence status of the residents in the public estate in Wong Tai Sin, Hong Kong.
For part-time Housing Studies students in Hong Kong
undertaking dissertation projects, the two most salient research ethics issues
are informed consent and voluntariness, and protection of vulnerable
participants and confidentiality—especially when research touches on
sensitive topics or involves groups with diminished autonomy.rss.hku+2
Two
main research ethics issues
1.
Informed consent and voluntariness (risk of coercion/undue influence)
Across Hong Kong university ethics guidelines,
researchers must ensure participation is voluntary, based on sufficient,
comprehensible information, and free from undue influence or inducement.
This is especially challenging in student projects where recruitment may rely
on personal networks (e.g., friends, classmates) or where participants may feel
obliged to help.hkmu.edu+4
- In an online questionnaire sent to friends
about Hong Kong’s 2026 housing policy, there is a risk that friends feel
social pressure to respond, undermining true voluntariness.hksyu+1
- In semi-structured interviews on domestic
violence, participants must clearly understand they can refuse or
withdraw without consequence; power dynamics and topic sensitivity
heighten the need for robust consent processes.researchintegrity.law.hku+1
2.
Protection of vulnerable participants and confidentiality (privacy,
sensitivity, and data security)
Hong Kong ethics policies emphasise special
protections for vulnerable groups (e.g., elderly, people experiencing
domestic violence) and strict confidentiality for sensitive data.
Vulnerable participants may have limited capacity to consent or may be at
greater risk of harm if identities or responses are disclosed.cuhk.edu+2
- Elderly residents in Tsuen Wan public estates may face cognitive, sensory, or language barriers; researchers
must adapt consent materials and ensure privacy during observation.cuhk.edu+1
- Domestic violence status is highly sensitive; any breach of confidentiality could expose
participants to stigma, retaliation, or safety risks. Guidelines require
that no publicly disclosed information identify specific persons or
organisations without written consent.eduhk+3
Two
practice advices (with reference to your three method cases)
Advice
1: Strengthen informed consent and reduce coercion in recruitment and data
collection
Design consent and recruitment to maximise clarity
and voluntariness, particularly where social ties or sensitive topics are
involved.hkmu.edu+1
- Online questionnaire to friends (housing
policy opinions):
- Embed an information sheet and explicit
consent tick-box at the start of the survey, stating purpose,
voluntary nature, right to withdraw, and how data will be used/stored.eduhk+1
- Avoid repeated reminders or personal appeals
that could feel pressuring; make it clear that non-response carries no
social penalty.hksyu
- Ensure the survey is anonymous by design
(no names/IPs stored) if possible; if not, explain confidentiality
safeguards clearly.hksyu+1
- Semi-structured interviews (domestic violence
in Wong Tai Sin):
- Use a written or audio-recorded consent
process that explains risks, benefits, confidentiality limits, and
the right to skip questions or stop at any time.hkmu.edu+1
- Conduct consent discussions in a private,
safe setting; allow participants to choose interview location/time to
reduce perceived pressure.eduhk+1
Advice
2: Implement robust confidentiality and vulnerability safeguards in design,
fieldwork, and data management
Treat elderly residents and domestic violence
survivors as potentially vulnerable; build extra layers of protection into
every stage.cuhk.edu+1
- Participant observation (elderly in Tsuen Wan
public estate):
- Obtain site permission (e.g., from
estate management) and, where feasible, individual consent for
those you closely observe; if observation is public/naturalistic, still
avoid recording identifiable details without justification.hksyu+1
- Use field notes with pseudonyms/codes,
avoid photographs or audio unless essential and consented; store data
securely and limit access to the research team.eduhk+1
- Adapt materials for comprehensibility (simple
language, large print, Cantonese/Mandarin as appropriate) and check
understanding verbally where needed.hkmu.edu+1
- Semi-structured interviews (domestic
violence):
- Collect minimal identifying data;
separate consent forms from interview transcripts; use participant codes
in all analysis and reporting.eduhk+1
- Store recordings and transcripts in encrypted,
password-protected files; define a clear retention period (e.g., 3–6
years) and secure disposal plan.hksyu+1
- Prepare a referral pathway (e.g.,
contact details for social services or NGOs) in case participants become
distressed or disclose imminent risk, and explain this in the information
sheet.eduhk+1
These practices align with Hong Kong university
ethics requirements that emphasise minimal risk, informed consent,
protection of vulnerable participants, and strong confidentiality/data security
for all human-participant research.
A collection of blog notes on using chatgpt for research purpose.
No comments:
Post a Comment