Study notes on organizational climate
References with extracted contents
Patterson,
M.G., M.A. West, V.J. Shackleton, J.E. Dawson, R. Lawthom, S. Maitlis, D.L.
Robinson and A.M. Wallace. 2005. "Validating the organizational climate
measure: links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation" Journal of Organizational Behavior 26,
Wiley: 379-408.
"Central
to most, if not all, models of organizational behavior are perceptions of the
work environment, referred to generally as ‘organizational climate’ (Rousseau,
1988). Primarily understood as an intervening variable between the context of
an organization and the behavior of its members, and attempting to understand
how employees experience their organizations, the concept has inspired many descriptions
and operationalizations. Despite the level of interest surrounding
organizational climate, however, there are few well-validated measures of the
construct".
"The
dominant approach conceptualizes climate as employees’ shared perceptions of
organizational events, practices, and procedures. These perceptions are assumed
to be primarily descriptive rather than affective or evaluative (Schneider
& Reichers, 1983). More recent work contradicts this view, suggesting
strong evaluative or affective components (Patterson, Warr, & West, 2004).
At the individual level of analysis, referred to as ‘psychological climate’
(James & Jones, 1974), these perceptions represent how work environments
are cognitively appraised and represented in terms of their meaning to and
significance for individual employees in organizations (James & Jones,
1974; James & Sells, 1981)".
"The
rationale behind aggregating individual data to a unit level is the assumption
that organizational collectives have their own climate and that these can be identified
through the demonstration of significant differences in climate between units
and significant agreement in perceptions within units (James, 1982). Perceptual
agreement implies a shared assignment of psychological meaning allowing
individual perceptions to be aggregated and treated as a higher-level
construct. Most research is now focused on aggregate rather than on
psychological climate (Schneider, Bowen, Ehrhart, & Holcombe, 2000)".
Rojas,
D., C. Segpieri and S. Nuti. 2014. "Organizational
climate: Comparing private and public hospitals within professional roles"
Suma Neg 5(11), Elsevier: 10-14.
"Organizational
climate is defined as the shared perceptions of the work environment
(Jones and James, 1979). This concept can be traced back to several studies,
for example, Lewin et al., (1939) analyse the relationship between the
leadership style and climate; Koffka (1935) focuses on “behaviour environment”;
Lewin (1936) studies the “life space”; and Phillips (1996) investigated how women
and men perceived the organizational climate. Some studies have shown the
efforts made to better understand those factors which contribute to improve the
work environment (or climate) and motivate all employees, regardless of their
position, status and gender, to be committed and effective performers (Clark,
1997; Gershon, 2007; Nembhard, 2006)".
"The
results of the present study support the hypothesis that there are differences
in how the organizational climate is perceived by employees within professional
roles and hospital status in the Tuscan healthcare organizations (General hospitals).
The analysis showed that the Tuscan organizational climate questionnaire is a
reliable instrument used as a measurement tool for evaluating working
conditions and deter-mining the factors which satisfies and motivates employees
in the healthcare sector".
Smith-Crowe,
K., M.J. Burke and R.S. Landis. 2003. "Organizational climate as a moderator
of safety knowledge-safety performance relationships" Journal of Organizational Behavior 24, Wiley: 861-876.
"For
some time now, applied psychologists and management researchers have adopted a
social interactionist perspective to study relations between individual
difference variables (e.g., knowledge and job performance). A common social
interactionist hypothesis is that the relationship between two individual difference
variables is moderated by a third class of variables: organizational climate
dimensions. Organizational climate dimensions are those characteristics of
workplaces that facilitate or inhibit the exhibition of certain behaviors (cf.
James, Demaree, Mulaik, & Ladd, 1992; Schneider, 1975; Schneider, Smith,
& Sipe, 2000).....".
"James
et al. (1992) and Russell and Gilliland (1995) have presented the argument that
organizational climate influences relationships between individual difference
variables specifically in terms of ‘restrictiveness-of-climate,’ which they
defined as the degree to which characteristics of organizational environments
restrict individual decision-making and individual differences in job
performance".
"Another
body of literature suggests that organizational climate moderates relationships
between individual difference variables to the extent that organizations
promote strategically focused climates (i.e., climates that are aligned with
organizational goals). This research is based on the assumption that
human
beings strive to cohere with their environments. To give an example, one would
expect that if an organization has a supportive climate for safety, then
individuals would seek to be productive organizational members by transferring
the knowledge and skills that they learned during safety training to their jobs".
Cooil,
B., L. Aksoy, T.L. Keiningham and K.M. Maryott. 2009. "The Relationship of
Employee Perceptions of Organizational Climate to Business-Unit Outcomes: An MPLS
Approach" Journal of Service Research
11(3), Sage: 277-294.
"The
origins of climate research date back to Lewin and his colleagues (Lewin,
Lippitt, and White 1939) who emphasized the role of leaders in the creation of
climate. Today, organizational climate can be defined as perceptions attributed
to the work environment (Rousseau 1988) and is used primarily as a framework to
understand how employees experience their work environment and is distinct from
employee satisfaction (Schneider and Snyder 1975)".
"The
importance of measuring organizational climate is critical, as it has been
shown to link to a variety of outcomes and successful organizational
functioning. Researchers have sought to understand how the dimensions of
organizational climate are related to a variety of business outcomes such as
employee retention, turnover, intentions to quit (Dean 2004; Hemingway and
Smith 1999; Mulki, Jaramillo, and Locander 2006; Ryan, Schmit, and Johnson
1996), customer satisfaction (Gelade and Young 2005; Heskett, Sasser, and
Schlesinger 1997; Schneider, White, and Paul 1998; Schneider et al. 2005), and
firm financial performance such as growth, sales, revenue, and profitability
(Borucki and Burke 1999; Gelade and Young 2005; Schneider et al. 2005)".
"Research
results on the dimensions of organizational climate, however, have been
wide-ranging since the inception of the area. Initially, it was assumed that
the social environment could be described by a limited number of dimensions,
such as individual autonomy, structure, reward orientation and consideration,
warmth, and support (Campbell et al.1970). Later, other dimensions were added,
such as role stress and lack of harmony, job challenge, autonomy, leadership
facilitation, work group cooperation, and friendliness (James and James 1989; James
and McIntyre 1996)".
D'Alleo,
G. and A. Santangelo. 2011. "Organizational climate and burnout in call-center
operators" Procedia - Social and Behavioral
Sciences 30, Elsevier: 1608-1615.
"In recent years, attention to issues related to the promotion of a climate
based on individual and organizational well-being in business success has
increased. The “climate” variable can affect the
behavior of the individual in adapting to the demands of the organization where
they work (Schneider, 1983). In this strategy one may see the study of
relationships between the dimensions of organizational climate and the
phenomenon of burnout; such as psycho-social risk. This syndrome can occur in
people working in contact with others (Cherniss, 1980) and as such it also
affects call center operators".
"The
organizational climate is a psychological construct that refers to the
perceptions developed by people with regard to their working environment: it is
a collective perception of the organization that originated in a small team and
manifests itself relatively stably through socio-psychological dynamics that
characterize the group. The climate is both the result and the determinant of
the behavior of individuals and groups within the organizational structure (Morocco,
Wells, 2003). The climate reflects the culture in society, its values and is
composed of different sizes (Ostroff, 1993): participation, warmth, social
rewards, cooperation, communication (affective factor), .....";
"Many
studies in the literature (Zapf, Knorz, Kulla, 1996; Groenblinghoff, Becker,
1996; Maslach, Leiter, 2000) show a significant correlation between
organizational climate and factors relating to actions or events related to stress,
burnout and mobbing. The climate variable influences the behavior of the
individual and then work performance (Schneider 1983)";
Akbaba,
ö and E. Altɪndağ. 2016. "The
Effects of Reengineering, Organizational Climate and Psychological Capital on the
firm performance" Procedia - Social and
Behavioral Sciences 235, Elsevier: 320-331.
"The
first study on climate concept is based on the motivation theory of Lewin et
al. It can be likened to the climate or weather definitions of geographic
regions formed by the combination of environmental forces. When analogies are
customized to the organization, the morale level surrounding the organization
can be expressed as the power of good will and sense of belonging among the
members of the organization. The climate is based on the perceptions
of employees for the organization (Terzi, 2002, 92). According to Şişman (2002,
156), it is the whole of factors which are perceived by the individuals who
constitute the organization and affect their behaviors";
"The
morale, motivation or sense of commitment to the organization of the
organization members are considered to be among the factors contributing to the
formation of organizational climate. While skiing can be enjoyable for someone
who loves winter sports, swimming will also be as enjoyable as it for someone
who loves summer. Organizational climate varies according to the employees...";
No comments:
Post a Comment