Study notes on marketing mix
References with extracted contents
Low, S.P.
and M.C.S. Tan. 1995. "A convergence of Western marketing mix concepts and
oriental strategic thinking" Marketing
Intelligence & Planning 13(2), Emerald: 36-46.
"The
basic marketing strategy used by a company is the result of the blending of
various marketing elements. These elements consist of: * the service offered
(or product); * the availability of service offered (or place); * the
promotion or communications to prospective client using various promotional
techniques; and
*
the
price charged for the service. The term marketing mix (Borden, 1964) or the
classical four Ps (McCarthy, 1960) have been used to describe these various
elements. Marketing strategy development may therefore be viewed as developing
a marketing mix aimed at satisfying the needs of selected markets and accomplishing
specific marketing objectives".
"...
in order to achieve organizational goals, the marketer must be engaged
constantly in fashioning a mix of marketing procedures and policies to cope
with the dynamic environment or, as it is otherwise known, the uncontrollable
variables"
"The
marketing mix concept has two important benefits. First, it is an important
tool used to enable one to see that the marketing manager’s job is, in a large
part, a matter of trading off the benefits of one’s competitive strengths in the
marketing mix against the benefits of others.... The second benefit of the marketing mix is
that it helps to reveal another dimension of the marketing manager’s job. All
managers have to allocate available resources among various demands, and the
marketing manager will in turn allocate these available resources among the
various competitive devices of the marketing mix".
Wise,
R. and N. Sirohi. 2005. "Finding the best marketing mix" Journal of Business Strategy 26(6),
Emerald: 10-11.
"... what’s
the best way to identify and implement the marketing mix that will advance your
company’s growth goals? These six guidelines provide a good starting point: 1. Set
up the right scorecards.... 2. Track and analyze... 3. Don’t be afraid to experiment...
4. Keep both brand and revenues in mind... 5. Look
over the fence.... 6. Build a ‘‘test and learn’’ culture...".
Vignali,
C. and B.J. Davies. 1994. "The Marketing
Mix Redefined and Mapped: Introducing the MIXMAP Model" Management Decision 32(8) Emerald:
11-16.
"In
the Macmillan Dictionary of Retailing, Baron, et al.[1]
define the retail marketing mix as “those activities that show similarities to
the overall process of marketing, requiring the combination of individual
elements”. This definition closely resembles traditional definitions of the marketing
mix given by well known marketeers from Levitt[2] to Kotler[3]. Also in this
tradition, Czinkota [4] gives
the following definition of the marketing mix: “A complex of tangible and
intangible elements to distinguish it in the market place”..".
"It
was after the Second World War that Cullotin originated the “P” philosophy of
marketing, proposing a long list of Ps which typified Profit, Planning,
Production etc. and which stood for the key activities of running a business.
It was his view that one could differentiate between a “sales orientated” and a
“manufacture oriented” company by examining the amount of emphasis given to the
different “Ps”...".
"The
service marketing literature[6,7] also extends the marketing mix, broadening the traditional four “Ps” into the
seven “Ps” of services by adding Physical Evidence, Participants and Process,
thus including all elements an organization can control in order to satisfy its
target market. In contrast, Jones and Vignali[8] add an “S” for Service which
should be included as an essential basic element of the marketing mix".
Rafiq,
M. and P.K. Ahmed. 1995. "Using the 7Ps as a generic marketing mix: an
exploratory survey of UK and European marketing academics" Marketing Intelligence & Planning
13(9) Emerald: 4-15.
"The
marketing mix concept is one of the core concepts of marketing theory. However,
in recent years, the popular version of this concept McCarthy’s (1964) 4Ps
(product, price, promotion and place) has increasingly come under attack with
the result that different marketing mixes have been put forward for different
marketing contexts. While numerous modifications to the 4Ps framework have been
proposed (see for example Kotler, 1986; Mindak and Fine, 1981; Nickels and
Jolson, 1976; Waterschoot and Bulte. 1992) the most concerted criticism has
come from the services marketing area. .... The proliferation of numerous ad hoc
conceptualizations has undermined the concept of the
marketing mix and what is required is a more coherent approach".
"Borden,
in his original marketing mix, had a set of 12 elements namely:
(1)
product planning;
(2)
pricing;
(3)
branding;
(4)
channels of distribution;
(5)
personal selling;
(6)
advertising;
(7)
promotions;
(8)
packaging;
(9)
display;
(10)
servicing;
(11)
physical handling; and
(12)
fact finding and analysis.
He
did not consider this list of elements to be fixed or sacrosanct and suggested
that others may have a different list to his".
"Industrial
marketing has, therefore, tended to emphasize the importance of building of
relationships in marketing rather than the manipulation of the market through
the marketing mix. The criticism levelled at the 4Ps by the interaction/network
approach is that personal contacts are rarely discussed and even then only in
the context of salesperson-consumer interaction, where the mass marketing
approach is insufficient (for example the sale of insurance and cars).".
Fan,
S., R.Y.K. Lau and J.L. Zhao. 2015. "Demystifying Big Data Analytics for
Business Intelligence Through the Lens of Marketing Mix" Big Data Research 2, Elsevier: 28-32.
"The marketing mix framework is a
well-known framework that identifies the principal components of marketing
decisions, and it has dominated marketing thought, research, and practice [6].
Borden[5]has been recognized as the first to use the term “marketing mix” and
he proposed a set of 12 elements. McCarthy [29]re-grouped Borden’s 12 elements
to four elements or 4Ps, namely product, price, promotion, and place. The 4P
model has been considered to be most relevant for consumer marketing. However,
it has been criticized as being a production-oriented definition of marketing,
and researchers proposed a fifth P (people) [18].".
Reid, D.M. 1980. "Evaluation
of the Marketing Mix - Its Application to Strategic Marketing" European Journal of Marketing 14(4),
Emerald:192-205.
"The
marketing mix concepts recognises that results are derived from a combination
of variables over which the marketer has control. Selection of, and concentration
on, a particular combination brings about a collective effect. While
the
execution of a marketing plan necessarily results in some sort of marketing mix
being evolved and directed at the market, there is often a glaring cognitive
gap between the marketing objectives established in the plan and the resulting
actions".
Martin,
D.M. 2009. "The entrepreneurial marketing mix" Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 12(4), Emerald:
391-403.
"Marketing
scholars and practitioners have long depended on the same basic elements for
success. The elements of successful corporate marketing have traditionally
boiled down to the familiar four P’s: price, promotion, product, and placement
(Kotler, 2001). Companies typically organize these elements into proven
patterns, marked by logical step-by-step processes. The plans behind the
patterns are both highly structured and disciplined (Carson, 1993)".
"While
it may seem appropriate to take the tradition of the four P’s as gospel, doing so
would blind one to important differences at the heart of entrepreneurial
experience. Gronroos (1994) argues that the usefulness of the four P’s as a
general theory is highly questionable. Others note that adherence to the four
P’s misses the “fundamental point of marketing – adaptability, flexibility and
responsiveness” (McKenna, 1991, p. 13) and is “both wasteful and inappropriate,
and consequently is not seen to function effectively” (Carson, 1993, p.
190)".
"For
entrepreneurs, tactics for using the marketing mix diverge from the traditional
progression of product development, pricing, promotion, and distribution. Entrepreneurs
prefer direct interchanges and building personal relationships".
Peattie,
K. and L. Peters. 1997. "The marketing mix in the third age of
computing" Marketing Intelligence
& Planning 15(3), Emerald: 142-150.
"Third
age technology has the potential to revolutionize many aspects of the mix, and many
companies are already making use of them in terms of product, price, place and promotion".
Wu,
C. and S. Wu. 1998. "A proposed method for the development of marketing
mix of the tea drink market" Asia
Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics 10(1), Emerald: 3-21.
"Development
of marketing mix has received considerable academic and industry attention.
However, the majority of the literature focused on product de sign but did not
ex tend it to the development of marketing mix. To meet the consumer’s needs
and wants for a successful product is necessary but not sufficient, especially,
for our target, tea drink. The other three Ps (Price, Promotion, Place) should
be taken into account. In our case, convenience purchasing is the major concern
of most of the consumers, but it cannot be merely satisfied by a product. Lauternborn
[11] thus proposed a new formula called the “Four C’s:” “consumer wants and
needs, cost to satisfy, convenience to buy and communication.”...".
No comments:
Post a Comment