Study note on innovation strategy
References with associated extracted contents
Sharmelly, R. 2017. "Crafting a
winning innovation strategy" Strategic
Direction 33(3), Emerald: 8-11.
"Over
recent years, the nature of innovation has changed in three distinct ways.
First, consumers have become increasingly involved in innovation. .... Second,
technological fusion has shortened product life cycles. .... Third, ecosystems
are emerging, pushing the frontier of new types of innovation. An ecosystem is
a diverse array of interdependent parties comprising companies, entrepreneurs,
venture capitalists and research organizations. They seek to create and use new
business ideas and value";
"Regarding innovation, top organizations
create organizational structures and functions implementing the following
strategies. Balancing
between innovation objectives and business objectives.... Adopting open innovation... Forming dedicated innovation teams... Creating
a culture of innovation... A strong and clear
focus on innovation... Emphasis on
fostering and promoting an innovation culture..... Agility";
Dobni, C.B., M.
Klassen and W.T. Nelson. 2015. "Innovation strategy in the US: top executives offer their
views" Journal of Business Strategy 36(1): 3-13.
"Innovation leads to the introduction of new products or services and the
creation of new value altogether. Organizations need innovation to meet
ever-changing demands of stakeholders or to out-compete rivals in an industry.
Innovation has many faces and ranges from a random event to new industries.
Companies that “get it” prove to be industry leaders. Not only do they create
new value on a consistent basis, they often redefine the competitive
landscape";
"A major barrier to innovation is the absence of a well-articulated
innovation strategy that is communicated to employees. Innovative organizations
that excel have a clear innovation strategy; they have created and communicated
innovation goals and objectives and have aligned these with their strategic
agenda. This alignment has advanced the innovation agenda by developing
planning processes and tools that fast-track innovation projects and plans so
that decision-making does not become bogged down";
Aagaard, A. 2012. "The Contribution of
Innovation Strategy Development and Implementation in Active Facilitation of
Pharmaceutical Front End Innovation" Systemic
Practice and Action Research 25(6) December: 457-477.
"During
the last decades extensive research has been conducted in the field of new
product development (NPD), and a growing body of research suggests that a firm
should proactively manage and optimize the front end innovation (FEI) to boost
the chances of developing successful innovations (Reinertsen 1999; Boeddrich
2004). A company’s ability to stimulate innovation is highly dependent on the
stock of potential ideas, which are available to feed the NPD process (Brennan
and Dooley 2005)";
Guan, J.C., R.C.M. Yam, E.P.Y. Tang and
A.K.W. Lau. 2009. "Innovation
strategy and performance during economic transition: Evidence in Beijing,
China" Research Policy 38,
Elsevier: 802-812.
"Innovation
strategy is fundamental to the success of innovation in manufacturing firms
(Gary, 2005; Burgelman et al., 2001). In a highly competitive environment, an
enterprise’s ability to keep up with the pace of innovation and maintain
ongoing innovation efforts are critical to its survival and growth. However,
the maintenance, acquisition and evolution of an enterprise’s capabilities depend
on its innovation objectives and the resultant innovation strategy (Burgelman
et al., 2001)";
"Innovation strategies can be
characterized in terms of technological leadership or followership, market
position and timing of market entry, and the scope and rate of new product
development (Burgelman et al., 2001). To facilitate and support its technological
innovation strategies, an organization needs a special mix of assets or
resources that encompasses technology, products, processes, knowledge,
experience and organization (Guan and Ma, 2003; Burgelman et al., 2001)";
Ndubisi, N.O., C.M. Capel, G.C. Ndubisi.
2015. "Innovation strategy and performance of international technology
services ventures: The moderating effect of structural autonomy" Journal of Service Management 26(4), Emerald:
548-564.
"Brown
and Eisenhardt (1995) delineated two major streams of innovation research – innovation
diffusion (across organisations, industries and nations) and related issues (O’Neill
et al.,
1998), and organisational structure, processes and people’s
influences on new product/service development and marketing (Zirger and
Maidique, 1990). The first school of thought defines innovation as a firm’s
first time usage of a technology, strategy, or management practice,
notwithstanding the rate of diffusion of the same innovation in the industry or
market (Nord and Tucker, 1987). To the second school, an innovation is a new
product that a firm has made for the market or commercialisation of an
invention (Myers and Marquis, 1969), including
upgrades, modifications, and extensions of existing goods and services that may
be new to the firm, the market, or the world";
Ko, Y.J. and Ma, L. 2017. "Forming a
firm innovation strategy through commitment-based human resource
management" The International
Journal of Human Resource Management [DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2017.1308415].
"The
literature suggests that a firm innovation is positively related to commitment-
based HRM (CHRM) practices (Ceylan, 2013; Collins & Smith, 2006) that embody
the long-term relationships with hiring employees based on knowledge and
developing their knowledge internally (Lepak & Snell, 2002). Employees’ knowledge
and organizational management of it, as key resources, contribute to firm
innovation (Chen & Huang, 2009; Detert & Burris, 2007). CHRM encourages
employees to commit their knowledge to solving the problems related to
innovation by taking risks".
No comments:
Post a Comment