Asking chatgpt to derive a research proposal based on an academic article: sept 30a. [Housing Studies-related]
The following is a record of my request to chatgpt (accessed via poe.com) to derive a research proposal based on an academic article: an example. The name of the article is: "Explaining homelessness as a movement using metaphors in European academic writings of homelessness".
My question 1 is: "Please provide a simple summary of the attached article."
The reply from chatgpt is: "The article by Suvi Raitakari explores how metaphors of movement shape the understanding of homelessness in European academic writings. It emphasizes the significance of metaphorical language in interpreting first-person experiences of homelessness, particularly through the prevalent metaphors of "pathways" and "circles."
Raitakari argues that the choice of metaphors in academic discourse is critical, as they influence the portrayal of personal experiences and causal relationships related to homelessness. The study analyzed 15 peer-reviewed articles published between 2012 and 2016 in three European journals: the European Journal of Homelessness, Housing Studies, and Housing, Theory and Society. Using a discursive metaphor analysis, the research highlighted how metaphors convey complex narratives of homelessness, often depicting it as a movement in various directions—either towards stability (pathways) or as a cyclical, unending experience (circles).
The findings reveal that "pathways" are frequently used to illustrate transitions from homelessness to stability, emphasizing individual agency and structural factors. For instance, pathways are often linked to life events like job loss or health issues, framing homelessness as a linear progression. In contrast, the metaphor of "circles" suggests a lack of clear exits from homelessness, portraying it as a repetitive cycle influenced by systemic issues.
Raitakari calls for increased awareness among researchers about the implications of metaphor usage in homelessness studies, suggesting that metaphors can either illuminate or obscure the realities faced by homeless individuals. The article concludes that while metaphors help in understanding the phenomenon of homelessness, there is a risk of oversimplifying complex social issues and personal narratives. It advocates for a critical examination of the discursive power of metaphors to enhance sensitivity in homelessness research and policy-making."
My question 2 is: "Please derive a research proposal from the attached article, indicating the proposal title, the research background, its research objectives and a few related research questions, an overall research methodology, some concepts and theories to use from the preliminary literature review. Lastly, briefly indicate the academic and practical value of the proposal. Tks."
The reply from chatgpt is : "Research Proposal Title
Metaphors of Movement: Understanding Homelessness through Discourse Analysis
Research Background
Homelessness is a multifaceted social issue that is often shaped by the language used to describe it. Metaphors play a crucial role in framing how homelessness is perceived and understood in academic literature. This research proposal builds on Suvi Raitakari's exploration of metaphors of movement—specifically "pathways" and "circles"—in European academic writings on homelessness. By analyzing how these metaphors influence perceptions of homelessness, this study aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of the lived experiences of homeless individuals and the structural factors that perpetuate their situation.
Research Objectives
To analyze the metaphors used in academic writings on homelessness and their implications for understanding the phenomenon.
To investigate how metaphors of movement shape perceptions of agency and structural influences in homelessness narratives.
To explore the potential disconnect between academic metaphor usage and the lived experiences of homeless individuals.
Research Questions
How do metaphors of movement (e.g., pathways and circles) frame the understanding of homelessness in academic literature?
What implications do these metaphors have for the perceived agency of homeless individuals?
How do academic discourses reflect or diverge from the language used by homeless individuals to describe their experiences?
What alternative metaphors could provide a more nuanced understanding of homelessness?
Overall Research Methodology
This study will employ a qualitative research methodology, specifically a discursive analysis of peer-reviewed articles and interviews with individuals who have experienced homelessness. The analysis will focus on identifying and interpreting metaphors used in the literature, as well as gathering first-person accounts to compare with academic discourse.
Concepts and Theories from Preliminary Literature Review
Social Constructionism: Understanding how social realities are constructed through language and discourse.
Metaphor Theory: Exploring how metaphors shape thought and influence perceptions of social phenomena.
Clapham’s Housing Pathways Framework: Analyzing the transitions between different housing situations and their implications for understanding homelessness.
Academic and Practical Value
This research has significant academic value as it contributes to the literature on homelessness by highlighting the role of language in shaping understanding and policy. Practically, it aims to inform policymakers and practitioners about the implications of metaphorical language, potentially leading to more compassionate and effective approaches to addressing homelessness. By bridging the gap between academic discourse and lived experiences, the study could foster a more inclusive narrative that better represents the complexities of homelessness."
Reference: a collection of blog notes on using chatgpt for research purpose.