A brief note on the hermeneutic circle: for Housing Studies students
Highlight 5
main ideas of the hermeneutic circle and then on the main steps of the circle,
done in a straightforward way in the context of Housing Studies dissertation
project study.
The hermeneutic
circle is a way of understanding a topic by repeatedly moving between its
small parts and the larger whole. In a Housing Studies dissertation, it means
interpreting individual interviews, policies, or case details while continually
checking them against the wider housing issue and research question.
Five main ideas
1.
Understanding
comes from parts and whole together.
You cannot understand one interview extract, housing statistic, or policy
clause fully without considering the wider context; equally, you understand the
whole study better after examining its parts.
2.
The researcher’s
prior knowledge matters.
Your background, assumptions, and existing knowledge of housing—such as beliefs
about affordability, tenure, or government policy—shape how you first interpret
the data. This is called a “pre-understanding.”
3.
Interpretation is
ongoing, not one-off.
You revisit the data several times. Each reading may reveal new meanings,
challenge earlier assumptions, and lead to a more developed interpretation.
4.
Different
perspectives can be brought into dialogue.
The participant’s view, the researcher’s view, existing literature, and the
housing context are compared and connected. Gadamer calls this a “fusion of
horizons”: a new understanding emerges from bringing these viewpoints together.
5.
The aim is deeper
interpretation, not simply proving a fixed hypothesis.
A hermeneutic approach is especially useful when studying people’s lived
experiences, meanings, and social contexts—for example, how tenants experience
insecure housing or how residents understand neighbourhood change.
Main steps in a Housing Studies dissertation
|
Step |
What you do |
Housing Studies example |
|||
|
Step |
What you do |
Housing Studies example |
|||
|
1. State your
starting understanding |
Identify your
research question, assumptions, and prior knowledge about the housing issue. |
“I assume that
private renters in Hong Kong face affordability pressure, but I need to test
and refine this through participants’ accounts.” |
|||
|
2. Read the
whole first |
Read interview
transcripts, policy documents, or case materials as a whole to get an initial
sense of the topic. |
Read all tenant
interviews once to understand the broad experience of renting. |
|||
|
3. Examine the parts |
Code or closely
analyse individual sentences, incidents, themes, or policy clauses. |
Focus on a
participant’s description of rent increases, overcrowding, or fear of
eviction. |
|||
|
4. Return to the
whole |
Ask how each
part changes your understanding of the overall issue; revise themes and
interpretations. |
Connect accounts
of rent increases to the broader issue of housing insecurity and
affordability. |
|||
|
5. Compare with
literature and context |
Bring in
academic literature, housing policy, and the local social context to
challenge and deepen your interpretation. |
Compare
participants’ experiences with literature on housing precarity, tenure
security, and Hong Kong housing policy. |
|||
|
6. Reflect and
revise |
Check whether
your own assumptions have changed; acknowledge alternative interpretations
and limitations. |
Recognise that
“affordability” may mean not only rent levels but also insecurity, commuting,
family obligations, and quality of life. |
|||
|
7. Present the
interpretation |
Explain the
final themes, show how they developed, and justify your interpretation with
evidence. |
Present themes
such as “financial pressure,” “housing insecurity,” and “trade-offs between
location and space,” supported by interview extracts and literature. |
|||
Simple example
If your
dissertation examines young renters’ experiences of housing affordability in
Hong Kong, you might first read all interviews for a general impression.
You then notice repeated mentions of long commutes, small flats, and unstable
rents. Returning to the whole dataset, you may reinterpret “affordability” as
more than monthly rent: it includes space, travel time, security, and quality
of life. You then compare this interpretation with housing literature and
revise your argument. This repeated movement between detailed evidence and the
wider housing issue is the hermeneutic circle.
No comments:
Post a Comment