An example of theory-decomposing on the Constant Comparative Method in Grounded Theory

An example of theory-decomposing on the Constant Comparative Method in Grounded Theory

 

On 5 main ideas on the Constant Comparative Method in Grounded Theory and describe 2 claims of this method in terms of Toulmin's model of argument. Also suggest 2 academic references on this method in Harvard Reference format.

 

    The Constant Comparative Method is a foundational technique in Grounded Theory for iteratively building theory from qualitative data.

Main Ideas

·        Ongoing Data Comparison: Researchers continuously compare incidents within and across data sources to spot similarities, differences, and patterns from the outset of analysis.

·        Code and Category Development: Emergent codes label data segments, which are then clustered into higher-level categories through repeated comparisons.

·        Iterative Refinement: Codes and categories evolve as new data challenges or saturates existing ones, ensuring fit with the data.

·        Integration into Theory: Comparisons culminate in linking categories to form a cohesive theory grounded in the empirical material.

·        Four-Stage Process: Includes comparing incidents per category, integrating properties, delimiting the theory, and writing it up.

Toulmin Claims

Claim 1: Rigorous Enough for Theory Building

This method generates substantive theories reliably from data. Data includes iterative comparisons yielding emergent categories (grounds). The warrant is Glaser and Strauss's procedural logic, ensuring saturation and fit, backed by its application across social units.

Claim 2: Inductive-Abductive Flexibility

It enables conceptual leaps beyond data via constant refinement. Grounds are examples of code-to-theory progression. Warrant lies in blending induction with abductive reasoning for abstraction, with qualifiers for researcher judgment.

 

References

Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.

Hallberg, L.R.M. (2006) 'The “core category” of grounded theory: Making constant comparisons', International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 1(3), pp. 141–148. doi:10.1080/17482620600858399.

 

Relevant links: on ALRA 2026.

A collection of blog notes on using chatgpt for research purpose.