I refer to the article of Liu and Forsythe (2010) to illustrate what are (a) theory-driven research objectives and (b) research questions.
Briefly, for
research objective, the article is: to evaluate the validity of the following:
- Drivers behind initial acceptance of online shopping can explain/ predict post adoption usage of online shopping channel
Liu and Forsythe (2010) also formulate related
research questions as follows:
Question 1: Do
online shopping motives inherited from traditional consumer studies affect
post-adoption online shopping behaviour?
Question 2: Why is it that consumers who perceive a high level of risk associated with online shopping may still choose to shop online?
These writers further indicate what major management theories to use, thus making clear the academic value of their study: This study is the first attempt to integrate 2 dominant theories, ie the
technology acceptance model and the
prospect theory, to gain understanding of why consumers,who perceive online shopping risk, still choose to maintain online shopping. This clearly indicates that the study is
theory-driven with some innovative initiative.
From the information provided in their article, it should be clear that the formulation of research objectives and research questions require
literature review efforts. It also indicates that literature review discusson (mainly in a separate chapter in a dissertation report) is not just lecture notes to explain concepts. Literature review drives the dissertation proposal formulation and, subsequently, the
research design of a dissertation project.
I need to remind students formulating dissertation proposals not only to make clear their research objectives and questions, but also justify these objectives and questions in terms of practical and academic values.
Reference
Liu, C. and Forsythe, S. (2010) "Sustaining Online Shopping: Moderating Role of Online Shopping Motives",
Journal of Internet Commerce 9, pp. 83-103.