A review of the article on “Balanced scorecard in the hospitality and tourism industry”
How to
present this article in Harvard reference format?
Fatima, T. & Elbanna, S., 2020. Balanced
scorecard in the hospitality and tourism industry: Past, present and future. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 91,
p.102656. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102656
[Accessed date].
Make sure to replace "[Accessed
date]" with the date you accessed the article.
What are the
key research issues the article wants to address?
The article addresses several key research
issues related to the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) in the hospitality and tourism
industry, including:
1.
Gap in BSC Research within Hospitality and
Tourism: Despite the increasing interest
and widespread use of the Balanced Scorecard since its introduction in 1992,
there is limited research specifically focused on its application in the
hospitality and tourism industry. The article aims to fill this significant gap
by reviewing and analyzing BSC research in this sector.
2.
Multidimensional Nature of Performance
Measurement: The article highlights that
traditional performance measurement tends to focus heavily on financial
indicators, which is limiting. It stresses the need for a more balanced
approach, as offered by the BSC, which includes multiple perspectives beyond
finance, reflecting the complex nature of organizational performance in
hospitality and tourism.
3.
Evaluation of BSC Adoption and
Implementation: One major research issue is to
understand how BSC is adopted and implemented in hospitality and tourism
organizations. The article notes that existing research is mostly exploratory
and calls for more in-depth studies, particularly to investigate challenges
causing delayed or failed implementations.
4.
Effectiveness of BSC as a Performance
Measurement Tool: The article identifies the need
to assess whether the BSC actually delivers on its promises in the hospitality
and tourism context, such as helping managers translate and communicate
strategy effectively, and enhancing overall organizational performance.
5.
Sustainability Integration into BSC: Given the rising importance of sustainable
tourism, a key issue is how sustainability can be incorporated into the BSC
framework, either within the traditional four perspectives or as a standalone
perspective, such as in the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard (SBSC) .
6.
Research Trends for Future Exploration: The article suggests future research should
explore areas such as new tourism management concepts, the causal relationships
among BSC perspectives, and the dynamic factors influencing BSC adoption and
implementation in the hospitality and tourism industry .
In summary, the article focuses on
bridging the knowledge gap regarding BSC’s adoption, implementation,
effectiveness, and integration of sustainability in the hospitality and tourism
industry, while proposing avenues for future research to enhance performance
measurement and strategic management practices in this sector.
Describe two main theories employed in this article.
The article primarily employs the following
two main theoretical frameworks:
1.
Balanced Scorecard (BSC) Theory: The core theoretical foundation of the
article is the Balanced Scorecard framework, originally introduced by Kaplan
and Norton in 1992. BSC serves as a multidimensional performance measurement
and strategic management system that goes beyond traditional financial metrics
by incorporating multiple perspectives—typically financial, customer, internal
business processes, and learning and growth—to provide a balanced view of
organizational performance. The article explores the evolution of BSC from a
mere performance measurement tool into a comprehensive strategic management
system and its applicability specifically to the hospitality and tourism
industry, focusing on its adoption, implementation, effectiveness, and
modifications such as the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard (SBSC).
2.
Sustainability Balanced Scorecard (SBSC)
Theory: The article also discusses the
extension of the traditional BSC by integrating the concept of sustainability
into the framework. The SBSC incorporates environmental and social dimensions
either within the existing four perspectives or as a standalone perspective,
reflecting the growing significance of sustainability in organizational
strategy, especially in hospitality and tourism. This theoretical adaptation
acknowledges the triple bottom line approach (economic, social, and
environmental performance) and aims to facilitate organizations in aligning
sustainability objectives with overall strategy and performance measures.
These two theories underpin the
analysis and discussion of BSC trends, challenges, and future research
directions within the hospitality and tourism industry as examined in the
article.
Highlight 2
main primary findings reported in this article.
Two main primary findings reported in the
article are:
1.
Limited but Growing Research on BSC in
Hospitality and Tourism with Four Key Trends: The study found that although Balanced
Scorecard (BSC) research in the hospitality and tourism industry is
comparatively limited—only 37 out of 106 empirical studies—it is gradually
increasing. The research in this industry primarily revolves around four main
trends: (a) BSC adoption and implementation, (b) integration of sustainability
with BSC (Sustainability BSC), (c) antecedents and consequences of BSC usage,
and (d) use of BSC as a foundational framework for performance measurement.
Unlike general business sectors where BSC adoption and implementation dominate
recent research, the hospitality and tourism sector has seen prominent use of
BSC primarily as a framework for developing performance measurement tools,
particularly in the earlier stages of research.
2.
Need for Industry-Specific and
Sustainability-Inclusive BSC Frameworks: The article highlights that the hospitality and tourism
industry's unique characteristics—labor-intensive operations, reliance on human
resources, intangible assets, and service inconsistency—necessitate tailored
BSC frameworks that incorporate non-financial measures, including employee and
customer performance dimensions. Additionally, there is emerging research
focusing on Sustainability Balanced Scorecards (SBSC) within the industry,
where environmental and social perspectives are either incorporated within
traditional BSC perspectives or treated as standalone aspects. This reflects
the industry's growing emphasis on sustainable tourism and the demand for
performance measurement systems that align with sustainability goals.
These findings point to both the
evolving adoption of BSC in the hospitality and tourism industry and the
critical importance of developing customized and sustainability-oriented BSC
models to effectively manage and measure performance in this sector.
Describe 3
main claims of the article in terms of Toulmin's model of argument.
Using Toulmin’s
model of argument (which includes Claim, Grounds, Warrant, Backing, Qualifier,
and Rebuttal), three main claims of the article can be described as follows:
1.
Claim 1: The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is an important
yet under-researched strategic management tool in the hospitality and tourism
industry.
·
Grounds: The article’s systematic review identified only 37
empirical studies focusing on BSC in hospitality and tourism out of 106 total
empirical BSC studies across business and management disciplines. This shows
limited research despite the industry’s specific needs and importance .
·
Warrant: The hospitality and tourism industry is
labor-intensive with complex stakeholder relationships requiring comprehensive
performance measurement systems, which BSC can provide.
·
Backing: Previous literature (Phillips and Louvieris, 2005;
Elbanna et al., 2015) has emphasized the need for more tailored performance
tools in this industry.
·
Qualifier: While BSC is increasingly studied generally, the
hospitality and tourism sector still lags behind in its adoption and research
attention.
·
Rebuttal: Some sectors within tourism still lack proper
application of BSC, and awareness among practitioners remains low.
2.
Claim 2: Integrating sustainability into the Balanced
Scorecard framework (creating a Sustainability Balanced Scorecard, SBSC) is
essential for advancing performance measurement in hospitality and tourism.
·
Grounds: The review highlights growing but still emerging research
on sustainability incorporated into BSC either within the existing perspectives
or as stand-alone perspectives (SBSC), with conceptual and exploratory studies
increasing in recent years .
·
Warrant: Sustainability concerns are critical in
hospitality and tourism given their environmental and social impacts, and thus
performance measurement must include these dimensions.
·
Backing: Scholars like Hansen and Schaltegger (2018) and
Hubbard (2009) support the importance of sustainability in BSC to reflect
broader organizational goals.
·
Qualifier: Current research is still limited and largely
exploratory, indicating a need for further empirical studies.
·
Rebuttal: Incorporation of sustainability poses challenges
in measurement and requires continuous refinement of BSC frameworks.
3.
Claim 3: Future research needs to focus on assessing the
effectiveness of BSC adoption and implementation in the hospitality and tourism
industry through longitudinal and empirical studies.
·
Grounds: The article discusses identified gaps regarding
evaluating whether BSC delivers on its promises and how long-term adoption
impacts organizational performance and stakeholder management .
·
Warrant: Understanding the actual impact and challenges of
BSC implementation is vital to encourage wider and more effective use in this
industry.
·
Backing: Prior critiques note BSC implementation is complex
and time-consuming and often delayed; yet longitudinal case studies can provide
deeper insights (Papalexandris et al., 2004; Bartlett et al., 2014).
·
Qualifier: While many exploratory studies exist, few have
rigorously tested BSC effectiveness over time in hospitality and tourism
settings.
·
Rebuttal: Implementation challenges and organizational
variability may limit generalization of findings, but targeted studies would
still contribute substantially.
These claims form
the backbone of the article’s argument for advancing Balanced Scorecard
research in hospitality and tourism, emphasizing the industry's specific needs,
the role of sustainability, and the call for empirical validation of BSC
effectiveness.
Describe 2
main research limitations of the study.
The article identifies the following two main
research limitations:
1.
Limited Scope of Industry-Specific
Research: Despite the systematic review’s
comprehensive search, the number of high-quality empirical studies on Balanced
Scorecard (BSC) in the hospitality and tourism industry remains relatively
small (only 37 studies out of 106). This limited scope restricts the
generalizability and depth of conclusions specific to hospitality and tourism,
indicating a research gap in this sector.
2.
Predominance of Exploratory and Conceptual
Research: Much of the existing BSC
research, especially concerning sustainability and hospitality and tourism, is
largely exploratory or conceptual in nature rather than empirical and
longitudinal. This limits the ability to draw strong causal inferences about
BSC adoption, implementation effectiveness, and its strategic impact over time
in the industry.
These limitations suggest the need
for more rigorous, empirical, and longitudinal studies focused on hospitality
and tourism contexts to better understand BSC’s application and outcomes in
this sector.
No comments:
Post a Comment