Lecture note on research philosophy for MBA students: positivism, interpretivism, pragmatism, and critical realism
Highlight 4 main ideas and 4 practice advices based on
the 4 ideas on each of the following 4 topics in the context of MBA
dissertation projects: 1. positivism 2. interpretivism 3. pragmatism 4.
critical realism
Based on MBA dissertation
research methodology, here are the 4 main ideas and 4
corresponding practice advices for each of the four research
philosophies:
1. POSITIVISM
4 Main Ideas
|
Idea |
Explanation |
|
Definition |
Reality is objective
and independent of the researcher; knowledge is observable,
measurable, and factual |
|
Core Assumption |
Only observable
phenomena and facts constitute valid knowledge; seeks universal laws
through statistical generalization |
|
Methodology |
Relies on structured
quantitative methods (surveys, experiments, statistical analysis)
with deductive approach |
|
Research Goal |
Form universal rules
and discoveries through hypothesis testing, aiming for replication
and objectivity |
4 Practice Advices
1.
Use quantitative
methods: Employ structured
surveys, experiments, or statistical analysis of objective data (e.g.,
financial statements, NAV-yield data)
2.
Apply deductive
approach: Start with hypotheses
derived from theory and test them empirically to confirm or reject
3.
Ensure reliability: Design for replication, validity,
and reliability using standardized instruments and large sample sizes
4.
Justify
objectivity: Explain how your
philosophy fits objective data types and research objectives
focused on testing relationships
2. INTERPRETIVISM
4 Main Ideas
|
Idea |
Explanation |
|
Definition |
Focuses on interpretations,
meanings, and understandings; reality is subjectively constructed through
human experiences |
|
Core Assumption |
Knowledge is interpreted
subjectively through experiences; researchers' values influence all
research phases |
|
Methodology |
Uses qualitative
methods (semi-structured interviews, case studies, focus groups,
observations) for depth and context |
|
Research Goal |
Explore diverse
attitudes, perceptions, and subjective human experiences within
specific social contexts |
4 Practice Advices
1.
Use qualitative
depth: Employ in-depth
semi-structured interviews, case studies, or focus groups to generate
rich, detailed data
2.
Adopt empathic
stance: Position
yourself as empathic and curious, understanding participants'
experiences from their own perspectives
3.
Contextualize data: Treat data as specific to its
context; emphasize subjective experiences and interpretive meaning-making
4.
Justify
subjectivity: Link
interpretivism to exploratory objectives seeking
perceptions/experiences in specific social contexts (e.g., REIT investor
motivations)
3. PRAGMATISM
4 Main Ideas
|
Idea |
Explanation |
|
Definition |
Focuses on practical
solutions, real-world outcomes, and answering research questions in the
most effective way |
|
Core Assumption |
Concepts are relevant
only if they support action; recognizes multiple realities and no single
viewpoint gives the entire picture |
|
Methodology |
Integrates qualitative
AND quantitative methods; can combine
deductive/inductive, objective/subjective approaches flexibly |
|
Research Goal |
Research question is
the primary determinant; use whatever method combination best advances
answers (like architects using materials) |
4 Practice Advices
1.
Justify by
research question: Explain that
your research question drives philosophy choice, not predetermined
method preferences
2.
Use mixed methods
strategically: Combine quantitative
+ qualitative (e.g., regression analysis of yield data + interviews
with REIT managers) when it advances answers
3.
Avoid forced
multiplicity: Don't use
multiple methods unless they advance the research; pragmatists use
methods that work best, not all methods
4.
Highlight
practical relevance: Emphasize real-world
outcomes and actionable solutions—aligns naturally with MBA's practical
focus
4. CRITICAL REALISM
4 Main Ideas
|
Idea |
Explanation |
|
Definition |
Distinguishes between
the 'real' world (unobservable structures) and 'observable'
world (visible events) |
|
Core Assumption |
Unobservable structures
cause observable events; the real
exists independently of human perceptions but can only be understood through
observation |
|
Methodology |
Requires understanding
generative structures behind events; often uses qualitative methods
to uncover hidden mechanisms |
|
Research Goal |
Understand social
world by explaining structures that generate events, not just describing
observable patterns |
4 Practice Advices
1.
Look beyond
observation: Design research
to uncover hidden causal structures behind observable
phenomena (e.g., market mechanisms behind price movements)
2.
Use explanatory
depth: Combine methods
that explain why events occur, not just what occurs—often
qualitative exploration of underlying mechanisms
3.
Justify for
complex phenomena: Use critical
realism for social/economic phenomena where unobservable
structures (power, institutions) shape outcomes
4.
Connect real to
observable: Explicitly show
how your methods link unobservable structures to observable events in
your analysis
Quick Integration for MBA Dissertation
Chain of Reasoning
Framework:
text
Research Question → Philosophy Choice → Approach →
Design → Methods → Quality Safeguards
Word Allocation (for 1,000–2,000 word methodology
chapter):
·
Research philosophy: 1–2 paragraphs (10–15% ≈ 100–300 words)
·
Name your stance
explicitly and link to data type + objectives
Choice Guidance for your context (Singapore
REITs/dividend stocks):
·
Positivism: Testing relationships (e.g., NAV yield vs.
dividend returns)
·
Interpretivism: Exploring investor perceptions/experiences
·
Pragmatism: Mixed methods (quantitative analysis +
qualitative interviews) — most common for MBA
·
Critical Realism: Understanding market mechanisms behind REIT
performance
Key: Justify choices, not just list them.
A collection of blog notes on using chatgpt for research purpose.
No comments:
Post a Comment