A note on using suitable literature review approaches in Housing Studies dissertation project works (information from perplexity.ai) [related to the topic of the agile literature review approach]
My question 1: "In the context of doing a 4-month part-time Housing Studies dissertation projects, suggest 2 suitable literature review approaches for writing the dissertation report chapter (chapter 2) of literature review (primarily on the academic literature): in each of the following 3 cases:
1. a consulting-oriented (primarily a specific group of stakeholders/ clients' concerns-driven) dissertation project type based on pragmatism 2. an academic-oriented (primarily research gaps and research issues driven) dissertation project type based on pragmatism 3. A dissertation project type that is equally consulting-oriented and academic-oriented, based on pragmatismThe reply: "Pragmatism in dissertation research emphasizes practical, actionable knowledge derived from real-world problems, making literature reviews focused on relevance, applicability, and experiential inquiry rather than rigid theoretical abstraction.
Case 1: Consulting-Oriented
Stakeholder-Driven Thematic Review
Prioritize themes aligned with clients' or stakeholders' practical concerns, such as housing policy implementation challenges in Hong Kong. Synthesize literature by evaluating which studies offer actionable solutions or tools directly addressing these concerns, using pragmatic criteria like real-world applicability and consequences of actions.
Problem-Solution Mapping
Map academic literature to specific stakeholder problems (e.g., affordable housing access), highlighting studies with proven interventions or frameworks adaptable to consulting needs. This approach operationalizes pragmatism by focusing on literature's potential to inform immediate recommendations.
Case 2: Academic-Oriented
Gap-Focused Critical Synthesis
Thematically organize literature around identified research gaps in housing studies, critically assessing methodological strengths and experiential insights from prior studies. Use pragmatism to evaluate literature based on its contribution to advancing knowledge through practical testing of theories.
Theoretical Evolution Tracing
Chronologically or conceptually trace evolving theories and paradigms in housing policy, pinpointing unresolved issues via pragmatic inquiry into their real-world testing and limitations. This builds a foundation for novel research questions.
Case 3: Balanced Consulting-Academic
Integrated Actionable Framework Review
Combine thematic review of research gaps with stakeholder-relevant applications, creating a dual-layered structure that links academic debates to practical housing outcomes. Pragmatism guides selection of literature bridging theory and action for comprehensive utility.
Hybrid Experiential Critique
Critique literature through interconnected lenses of experience, knowing, and acting, balancing academic rigor (e.g., methodological gaps) with consulting value (e.g., scalable policy insights). This ensures the review supports both theoretical advancement and stakeholder solutions."
My question 2: "Recommend 2 YouTube videos on introducing the topic of literature review and highlight the main ideas on each of these 2 YouTube videos."
The reply: "Two highly recommended YouTube videos introduce the essentials of literature reviews effectively for dissertation writers like those in Housing Studies. These selections focus on clear, step-by-step guidance suitable for a 4-month part-time project.
Video 1: "Literature Review Introduction 2026 The EASIEST EXPLANATION" by Dr B
This 16-minute video (published Nov 2025) emphasizes the literature review introduction's role in setting rationale and justification.
Key ideas include structuring the intro systematically—from defining the concept and providing historical/current background to identifying gaps and leading to research questions—using storytelling for flow.
It previews a full literature review playlist covering methodology, synthesis over summary, and practical examples like structured reviews with contextual background and contemporary debates. [the link]
Video 2: "How to Write a Literature Review: 3 Minute Step-by-step Guide | Scribbr"
This concise 3-minute video (2020) outlines five core steps for writing a literature review.
Main points cover searching relevant literature, evaluating/selecting sources, identifying themes/debates/gaps, outlining structure, and writing with intro/body/conclusion.
It stresses critical synthesis of existing research to position your work, linking to a detailed playlist for deeper dives. [the link]".
No comments:
Post a Comment