A study note on the philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein and social science research

A study note on the philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein and social science research (information from perplexity.ai)

My question 1: "What is the philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein all about with reference to social science research?"

The reply: "Ludwig Wittgenstein's philosophy, especially his later work (from the 1930s until his death in 1951), has significant implications for social science research, primarily through its focus on language, meaning, and social practices rather than empirical observation or scientific methods.

Key points about Wittgenstein's philosophy in relation to social science research are:

• Philosophy as Conceptual Clarification: Wittgenstein viewed philosophy not as an empirical science but as a discipline aimed at clarifying concepts and dissolving confusions in how language is used. This approach is particularly relevant to social sciences, which deal with complex social concepts and meanings rather than purely causal explanations.

• Language-Games and Forms of Life: Wittgenstein introduced the idea that meaning arises from "language-games" embedded in "forms of life," meaning that understanding human behavior and social phenomena requires examining the shared social practices and norms that give language its sense. This challenges the idea that social sciences should mimic natural sciences in method.

• Rule-Following and Social Normativity: Wittgenstein's notion of rule-following emphasizes that social norms and meanings are not fixed by explicit rules but are sustained through communal practices. This insight has been used to argue against positivist approaches in social science and for interpretive methods that start from participants' own understandings.

• Distinction Between Explanation by Reasons and Causes: Wittgenstein's philosophy helps distinguish social science explanations in terms of reasons (why people act as they do, involving meaning and intention) from natural science explanations in terms of causes. This supports the view that social sciences require different methodologies than natural sciences.

• : Wittgenstein's work supports the idea that social sciences cannot be reduced to natural sciences because social phenomena involve language, meaning, and shared human practices that are not fully capturable by empirical or causal methods.

• Philosophy's Role in Social Sciences: Wittgensteinian philosophy aids social scientists by clarifying conceptual confusions and providing a framework to understand the normative and interpretive dimensions of social life, rather than by offering empirical data or policy prescriptions.

In summary, Wittgenstein's philosophy encourages social science research to focus on the interpretive understanding of social practices, language use, and norms, emphasizing conceptual clarity over empirical generalization or causal explanation. This approach has influenced interpretive sociology, social psychology, and social philosophy by highlighting the importance of language, rule-following, and forms of life in human social behavior."

My question 2: "Please clarify our topic of discussion a bit more using the examples of:

1. "to investigate Gen Zs' happiness when visiting Hong Kong Disneyland Theme Park" (a Business Management related research theme)

2. ""to investigate Hong Kong elderly residents' feeling of quality of residential life" in the public housing estate in Wong Tai Sin, Hong Kong" (a Housing Studies related research theme)."

The reply: "Let me clarify how Ludwig Wittgenstein’s philosophy applies to your two social science research themes by focusing on language, meaning, and social practices.

1. 

• : According to Wittgenstein, the concept of "happiness" is not fixed or universal but depends on how it is used in social contexts—what he calls a "language-game." For Gen Z visitors, "happiness" might be expressed through specific language, behaviors, or social interactions unique to their cultural and generational context.

• : The experience of happiness at Disneyland is embedded in the social practices and cultural norms of both the theme park environment and Gen Z’s lifestyle. Understanding their happiness means exploring how they talk about, interpret, and enact enjoyment within this particular "form of life."

• : Instead of measuring happiness solely through standardized surveys or quantitative metrics, a Wittgensteinian approach would encourage qualitative methods (e.g., interviews, participant observation) to capture how Gen Z visitors use language to describe their feelings, what activities they associate with happiness, and how their social context shapes these meanings.

2. 

• : Wittgenstein would urge researchers to clarify what "quality of residential life" means to the elderly residents themselves, as the term can vary widely depending on cultural, social, and individual factors.

• Rule-Following and Normativity: The elderly’s feelings about their living environment are shaped by shared social norms and expectations—what counts as a "good" residential life in their community. These norms are maintained through everyday practices and language, not just physical conditions.

• : Instead of assuming universal standards for quality of life, researchers should explore how residents talk about their experiences, what aspects they emphasize (e.g., social connections, safety, accessibility), and how these meanings are embedded in their daily routines and community life.

• : This suggests using ethnographic or narrative methods to uncover the nuanced, lived meanings of residential quality, recognizing that these meanings are constructed and sustained through social interaction and language.

Wittgenstein’s philosophy encourages social science researchers to:

• Focus on how people use language to express concepts like happiness or quality of life in their specific social contexts.

• Understand that meanings are not fixed but arise from social practices ("forms of life") and shared norms.

• Use interpretive, qualitative methods to capture the richness and variability of human experience, rather than relying solely on standardized measurements.

• Clarify concepts by examining ordinary language use to avoid conceptual confusion and better understand the phenomena under study.

By applying this approach, your research on Gen Z happiness at Disneyland or elderly residents’ quality of life in Wong Tai Sin can gain deeper insights into the lived realities and meanings that quantitative data alone might miss."

My question 3: "Please highlight 10 major ideas of the philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein with reference to social science research."

The reply: "Here are 10 major ideas from Ludwig Wittgenstein’s philosophy as they relate to social science research, based on the provided sources:

1. Philosophy as Conceptual Clarification
   Wittgenstein viewed philosophy not as an empirical science but as a discipline aimed at clarifying concepts and resolving confusions in language use, which is crucial for social scientists to avoid conceptual muddles in their research.

2. Distinction Between Reasons and Causes
   Social sciences explain human behavior primarily in terms of reasons (meanings, intentions), unlike natural sciences that focus on causes (physical or causal explanations). This distinction highlights the unique methodology needed in social research.

3. Language-Games and Social Practices
   Meaning arises from language used within specific social contexts or "language-games." Understanding social phenomena requires analyzing these language-games embedded in forms of life, not just abstract definitions.

4. Forms of Life as the Basis of Meaning
   Social norms and meanings are rooted in shared communal practices ("forms of life"), which shape how concepts are understood and used. Social science research must attend to these lived social practices.

5. Rule-Following as Socially Grounded
   Wittgenstein emphasized that following rules is a social activity grounded in communal agreement and practice, not merely individual cognition. This insight challenges individualistic or purely psychological explanations in social science.

6. Anti-Reductionism: Social Sciences Are Not Reducible to Natural Sciences
   Wittgenstein’s philosophy supports the view that social sciences cannot be reduced to natural sciences because social phenomena involve language, meaning, and normativity that transcend empirical causality.

7. The Priority of the Social in Meaning and Knowledge
   Knowledge and meaning depend on the social context and shared concepts. Private experience alone cannot ground meaning; it is the communal language and practices that make understanding possible.

8. Philosophy Helps Overcome Ideological Confusions
   Wittgenstein’s approach can clear confusions in ideological and political theory by exposing conceptual errors rather than directly engaging with ideological content, aiding social scientists in critical reflection.

9. Focus on the Normative and Interpretive Dimensions of Social Life
   Wittgenstein’s philosophy highlights that social life is governed by norms and interpretations, not just observable behavior. This supports interpretive methodologies in social research that seek to understand meanings and values.

10. Therapeutic Role of Philosophy: Changing How We See Social Reality
    Wittgenstein’s method encourages a "way of seeing" that can change attitudes and perceptions, which social critics and researchers can use to challenge and transform social and political life.

These ideas collectively emphasize that social science research should focus on language, meaning, social norms, and conceptual clarity rather than solely on empirical causality or scientific reductionism. Wittgenstein’s philosophy provides tools for understanding the complexity of social phenomena as embedded in shared human practices and forms of life."

My question 4: "Please introduce 4 specific analysis methods in the philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein that can inform specific research method practices in Housing Studies and MBA studies."

The reply: "Four Wittgenstein-Inspired Analysis Methods for Housing Studies and MBA Research

Ludwig Wittgenstein’s philosophy offers distinctive approaches to analysis that can enrich research practices in both Housing Studies and MBA programs. Here are four specific methods, each with practical implications for research design and analysis:

1. 

• :
  Wittgenstein emphasized that many research problems arise from unclear or confused concepts. His method involves clarifying how key terms (e.g., "quality of life," "leadership," "community") are actually used in everyday language and within specific research contexts.

• :
  In Housing Studies, this means scrutinizing what "affordable housing" or "community satisfaction" means to residents, policymakers, and developers. In MBA research, clarifying terms like "innovation" or "organizational culture" can prevent miscommunication and improve the validity of findings.

• :
  Researchers conduct detailed analyses of language use in interviews, policy documents, or organizational discourse to ensure that all stakeholders share an understanding of key concepts before measurement or intervention.

2. 

• :
  Wittgenstein’s notion of "language-games" highlights that meaning is determined by use within particular social practices. Each context (e.g., a housing estate, a business meeting) has its own rules for how language is used.

• :
  In Housing Studies, researchers might analyze how residents discuss "safety" or "neighborhood" in their own terms, rather than imposing external definitions. In MBA studies, examining how managers and employees use terms like "strategy" or "performance" can reveal underlying assumptions and power dynamics.

• :
  This involves collecting and analyzing naturally occurring conversations, meeting transcripts, or community forums to map out the "language-games" at play and understand how meaning is constructed in context.

3. 

• :
  Wittgenstein argued that social life is structured by implicit rules that are followed in practice, not just by explicit policies or laws. Understanding how people follow (or deviate from) these rules is crucial.

• :
  In Housing Studies, this could mean studying how residents interpret and enact rules about communal spaces or maintenance. In MBA research, it could involve exploring how employees adapt formal procedures to real-world situations.

• :
  Researchers use ethnographic observation or in-depth interviews to uncover the tacit rules guiding behavior, and how these rules are negotiated, contested, or changed over time.

4. 

• :
  Rather than solving research problems through new theories, Wittgenstein’s "therapeutic" approach seeks to dissolve them by revealing conceptual misunderstandings or category errors.

• :
  In Housing Studies, this might involve showing that disputes over "quality of life" stem from conflicting conceptual frameworks rather than empirical disagreements. In MBA studies, it can help resolve persistent debates (e.g., over "leadership styles") by clarifying the conceptual landscape.

• :
  Researchers facilitate reflective discussions, workshops, or analytic memos to help participants and stakeholders see issues from new perspectives, often leading to practical breakthroughs by reframing the problem.

Method	Housing Studies Example	MBA Example
Conceptual Clarification	Defining "affordable housing" with residents	Clarifying "organizational culture"
Language-Game Analysis	Analyzing how "community" is discussed	Mapping use of "strategy" in meetings
Rule-Following Investigation	Observing communal space usage	Studying adaptation of formal policies
Therapeutic Method	Reframing "quality of life" disputes	Dissolving debates on leadership

 

These Wittgensteinian analysis methods help researchers in Housing Studies and MBA programs move beyond surface-level data, enabling deeper insight into the lived realities, language, and social practices that shape outcomes in their fields."

A collection of blog notes on using chatgpt for research purpose.