A note on literature review priority of research gaps-research objectives-driven dissertation projects

A note on literature review priority of research gaps-research objectives-driven dissertation projects (information from perplexity.ai)

My question 1: "What are the effort priority of literature review (towards concept definitions, academic theories, theoretical perspectives, research methods, empirical findings and academic debate topics) of research gaps-research objectives-driven dissertation projects, with reference to the following three project profiles:

Profile 1: accounting and finance topic of "capital structure issues in Hong Kong", using mixed methods research.

Profile 2: MBA topic of "frugal consumer buying behaviors in Hong Kong", using mixed methods research.

Profile 3: Housing Studies topic of "Gen Zs home ownership aspirations in Hong Kong", using mixed methods research.

The reply: "Below is a detailed analysis of the effort priority in conducting literature reviews for research gaps and research objectives-driven dissertation projects, focusing on the key components: concept definitions, academic theories, theoretical perspectives, research methods, empirical findings, and academic debate topics. The analysis is tailored to the three distinct project profiles you provided, all using mixed methods research in the Hong Kong context.

Effort Priority of Literature Review Components in Dissertation Projects

Key Components in Literature Review

1. Concept Definitions
   Clarifying key terms and constructs.

2. Academic Theories
   Identifying relevant theories that underpin the research.

3. Theoretical Perspectives
   Exploring different viewpoints or frameworks guiding the study.

4. Research Methods
   Reviewing methodological approaches and justifying mixed methods.

5. Empirical Findings
   Summarizing previous research results related to the topic.

6. Academic Debate Topics
   Highlighting controversies, gaps, or unresolved issues in the literature.

Profile 1: Accounting and Finance

Topic: Capital Structure Issues in Hong Kong

Method: Mixed Methods Research

Effort Priority Analysis

Literature Review Component	Priority Level	Rationale
Concept Definitions	High	Precise definitions of "capital structure," "leverage," and related financial terms are fundamental to avoid ambiguity.
Academic Theories	Very High	Strong emphasis on classical and contemporary capital structure theories (e.g., Modigliani-Miller, trade-off theory, pecking order theory) is critical to frame the research gap and objectives.
Theoretical Perspectives	High	Different perspectives (e.g., agency theory, market timing theory) should be explored to provide a comprehensive theoretical foundation.
Research Methods	Medium to High	Justification of mixed methods is important, especially how qualitative insights complement quantitative financial data.
Empirical Findings	Very High	Extensive review of empirical studies on capital structure in Hong Kong and comparable markets is essential to identify gaps and contextual relevance.
Academic Debate Topics	High	Focus on debates around market efficiency, regulatory impacts, and firm-specific factors influencing capital structure in Hong Kong.

 

Profile 2: MBA

Topic: Frugal Consumer Buying Behaviors in Hong Kong

Method: Mixed Methods Research

Effort Priority Analysis 

Literature Review Component	Priority Level	Rationale
Concept Definitions	High	Clear definitions of "frugality," "consumer behavior," and related constructs are necessary to delineate the scope.
Academic Theories	High	Behavioral economics, consumer decision-making theories, and theories of frugality should be emphasized to underpin the study.
Theoretical Perspectives	Medium to High	Perspectives such as cultural, psychological, and socio-economic influences on frugality need to be discussed.
Research Methods	High	Mixed methods justification is crucial to capture both quantitative patterns and qualitative motivations behind frugal buying.
Empirical Findings	High	Review of empirical research on frugal consumption, especially in Asian or Hong Kong contexts, to identify gaps.
Academic Debate Topics	Medium	Debates may include the impact of economic uncertainty, sustainability concerns, and cultural shifts on consumer frugality.

 

Profile 3: Housing Studies

Topic: Gen Zs Home Ownership Aspirations in Hong Kong

Method: Mixed Methods Research

Effort Priority Analysis 

Literature Review Component	Priority Level	Rationale
Concept Definitions	Very High	Defining "home ownership aspirations," "Gen Z," and housing affordability is critical given the socio-economic complexity.
Academic Theories	High	Theories related to housing economics, social stratification, and life course perspectives should be reviewed.
Theoretical Perspectives	Very High	Multiple perspectives including social, economic, and psychological factors influencing Gen Z's housing aspirations are important.
Research Methods	High	Mixed methods are essential to understand both statistical trends and personal narratives of Gen Z.
Empirical Findings	High	Review of recent empirical studies on housing demand, affordability, and generational differences in Hong Kong and similar urban contexts.
Academic Debate Topics	Very High	Debates around housing policy, market dynamics, intergenerational equity, and the impact of socio-political factors on home ownership aspirations.

 

Summary Table of Effort Priority by Profile

Component	Profile 1: Accounting & Finance	Profile 2: MBA (Consumer Behavior)	Profile 3: Housing Studies (Gen Z)
Concept Definitions	High	High	Very High
Academic Theories	Very High	High	High
Theoretical Perspectives	High	Medium to High	Very High
Research Methods	Medium to High	High	High
Empirical Findings	Very High	High	High
Academic Debate Topics	High	Medium	Very High

 

Practical Recommendations for Literature Review Effort Allocation

• Start with Concept Definitions: Ensure clarity on key terms to build a solid foundation.

• Prioritize Academic Theories and Empirical Findings: These anchor the research gap and objectives.

• Balance Theoretical Perspectives and Academic Debates: Especially important in social sciences and interdisciplinary topics.

• Justify Mixed Methods Research Thoroughly: Mixed methods require clear rationale and integration strategies, so allocate sufficient effort here.

• Contextualize All Components to Hong Kong: Given the local focus, emphasize regional studies and socio-economic context.

My question 2: "Yes, please draft a structured literature outline for each of the three profiles mentioned."

The reply: "Here are structured literature review outlines tailored for each of the three dissertation profiles, designed to align with their research gaps and objectives using mixed methods research in the Hong Kong context.

Profile 1: Accounting and Finance

Topic: Capital Structure Issues in Hong Kong

Method: Mixed Methods Research

Structured Literature Review Outline

1. Introduction to Capital Structure

   • Definition and key concepts (e.g., leverage, debt-equity ratio)

   • Importance of capital structure in corporate finance

2. Academic Theories on Capital Structure

   • Modigliani-Miller theorem and its assumptions

   • Trade-off theory

   • Pecking order theory

   • Agency theory and market timing theory

3. Theoretical Perspectives Relevant to Hong Kong Context

   • Corporate governance and regulatory environment in Hong Kong

   • Market-specific factors influencing capital structure decisions

4. Research Methods in Capital Structure Studies

   • Overview of quantitative approaches (e.g., regression analysis)

   • Qualitative methods (e.g., interviews with CFOs)

   • Justification and integration of mixed methods in prior research

5. Empirical Findings on Capital Structure in Hong Kong and Similar Markets

   • Review of recent empirical studies on capital structure determinants

   • Impact of economic cycles and policy changes

   • Comparative studies with other Asian financial markets

6. Academic Debates and Research Gaps

   • Controversies over the applicability of Western theories in Hong Kong

   • Debates on the role of state-owned enterprises and family firms

   • Identified gaps for further exploration (e.g., hybrid financing, SME capital structure)

7. Summary and Link to Research Objectives

   • Synthesis of literature to justify research focus

   • Identification of specific gaps the dissertation will address

Profile 2: MBA

Topic: Frugal Consumer Buying Behaviors in Hong Kong

Method: Mixed Methods Research

Structured Literature Review Outline

1. Defining Frugality and Consumer Behavior

   • Conceptual definitions of frugality and related constructs

   • Distinction between frugality, thriftiness, and minimalism

2. Theoretical Foundations

   • Behavioral economics theories relevant to frugality

   • Consumer decision-making models (e.g., Theory of Planned Behavior)

   • Psychological theories explaining frugal behavior

3. Theoretical Perspectives on Cultural and Socioeconomic Influences

   • Influence of Hong Kong’s socio-economic environment on consumer behavior

   • Cultural values and norms shaping frugality

4. Research Methods in Studying Consumer Behavior

   • Quantitative survey designs and behavioral experiments

   • Qualitative approaches such as focus groups and in-depth interviews

   • Mixed methods rationale and examples in consumer research

5. Empirical Evidence on Frugal Consumer Behaviors

   • Studies on frugality in Asian markets, with emphasis on Hong Kong

   • Impact of economic uncertainty and sustainability trends

   • Consumer segmentation and typologies of frugal buyers

6. Academic Debates and Emerging Issues

   • Debate on whether frugality is driven by necessity or choice

   • Discussions on frugality’s relationship with environmental sustainability

   • Gaps in understanding digital influences and post-pandemic behavior changes

7. Summary and Research Gap Identification

   • Summary of key insights and unresolved questions

   • Connection to research objectives focusing on Hong Kong’s unique context

Profile 3: Housing Studies

Topic: Gen Zs Home Ownership Aspirations in Hong Kong

Method: Mixed Methods Research

Structured Literature Review Outline

1. Conceptualizing Home Ownership Aspirations and Gen Z

   • Definitions of home ownership aspirations and related terms

   • Characteristics and socio-demographic profile of Gen Z

2. Relevant Academic Theories

   • Housing market theories (e.g., affordability, demand-supply dynamics)

   • Life course theory and generational theory

   • Social stratification and economic theories affecting housing aspirations

3. Theoretical Perspectives on Socioeconomic and Psychological Factors

   • Influence of economic pressures, employment, and income on Gen Z

   • Psychological factors such as attitudes, expectations, and future orientation

4. Research Methods in Housing Studies

   • Quantitative methods: surveys, housing market data analysis

   • Qualitative methods: interviews, focus groups with Gen Z participants

   • Justification for mixed methods to capture complex aspirations

5. Empirical Findings on Gen Z Housing Aspirations

   • Studies on housing affordability and ownership trends in Hong Kong

   • Comparative insights from other global cities with similar housing challenges

   • Impact of policy, social changes, and pandemic effects on aspirations

6. Academic Debates and Policy Discussions

   • Debates on the effectiveness of housing policies for young adults

   • Intergenerational equity and socio-political influences on housing markets

   • Identification of gaps related to Gen Z’s unique perspectives and behaviors

7. Summary and Alignment with Research Objectives

   • Integration of literature insights to frame the dissertation focus

   • Clear articulation of research gaps and objectives"

My question 3: "How do empirical studies inform the development of my structured outlines?"

The reply: "Empirical studies play a crucial role in informing the development of your structured literature review outlines by providing concrete, data-driven insights that help you:

1. Contextualize Your Research Topic
   Empirical studies offer background and real-world evidence that situate your research within the current state of knowledge. They help you understand what has been observed or measured previously, which informs how you frame your research questions and objectives.

2. Identify Research Gaps
   By reviewing empirical findings, you can pinpoint where knowledge is lacking, inconsistent, or contested. This identification of gaps guides the focus of your literature review and justifies the need for your study.

3. Support or Challenge Theoretical Frameworks
   Empirical data either support existing academic theories or reveal their limitations in specific contexts. This informs which theories and theoretical perspectives to emphasize or reconsider in your outline.

4. Inform Methodological Choices
   Examining empirical studies helps you understand which research methods have been effective or problematic in similar studies. This insight aids in justifying your choice of mixed methods and in structuring the methodology section of your outline.

5. Structure the Literature Review Logically
   Empirical studies often follow a standardized format (IMRaD: Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion), which can guide the organization of your literature review by themes such as findings, methodologies, and debates.

6. Synthesize Evidence to Build Arguments
   Summarizing and comparing empirical results from multiple studies allows you to construct coherent narratives in your literature review, highlighting trends, contradictions, and consensus in the research field.

7. Develop Clear Research Objectives and Hypotheses
   Insights from empirical studies help you formulate precise research questions and hypotheses grounded in observed phenomena, which should be reflected in the literature review outline to maintain focus and coherence.

Practical Application to Your Structured Outlines

• For Concept Definitions and Academic Theories: Use empirical studies to see how key concepts are operationalized and tested, ensuring your definitions align with observed realities.

• For Theoretical Perspectives: Empirical findings may reveal which perspectives best explain phenomena in your specific context (e.g., Hong Kong), helping prioritize which to include.

• For Research Methods: Review empirical studies’ methodologies to justify your mixed methods approach and anticipate challenges or best practices.

• For Empirical Findings: Summarize key results from prior studies to identify patterns or gaps, which directly shape your research gap and objectives sections.

• For Academic Debates: Use conflicting empirical results to highlight ongoing debates and unresolved issues, framing your study’s contribution.

In sum, empirical studies provide the evidence base that anchors your literature review, ensuring it is grounded, relevant, and logically structured to support your dissertation’s research gaps and objectives."

A collection of blog notes on using chatgpt for research purpose.