Study
note on product innovation
References
with some extracted contents
Vinding,
AL &
Lundvall, B-Å 2004, Product
innovation and economic theory: User-producer Interaction in the Learning
Economy. in Christensen, Jesper L. ;
Lundvall, Bengt-Åke (eds) (ed.), Product Innovation, Interactive
Learning and Economic Performance. JAI Press Ltd, Oxford, pp. 101-128.
Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy, no. 8.
"Product
innovations – defined as innovations addressing users not belonging to the innovating
firm – are important when it comes to sustain competitive advantage. The
business sector allocates more than half their R&D resources to product innovation.
Innovation surveys demonstrate that more than half of all firms have introduced
at least one product innovation over a three year-period. There are sector differences
in this respect but there is little doubt that most firms see product innovation
as a necessary element in their business strategies";
"Innovations may be seen as distinct
events, which can be dated in time. Empirical work trying to explain innovation
has often taken its departure in a list of such dated events..... we see single innovations as elements in a cumulative
process. The outcome of this process may be incremental technical change or
discrete leaps in technical opportunities. But, the process from which it emanates
is always cumulative – even the most conspicuous single innovation has its
roots
in accumulated knowledge and experience";
"We shall regard single innovations as
the result of collisions between technical opportunity and user needs.
We acknowledge that single innovations might result from pure accidents, but we
do not see this as the normal pattern. Innovation takes place when there are
new developments either in terms of technological opportunities or in terms of
new user needs and normally it is when the two sides meet that innovation takes
place";
Su, Z., E. Xie, H. Liu and W. Sun. 2013. "Profiting
from product innovation: The impact of legal, marketing, and technological
capabilities in different environmental conditions" Mark Lett 24, Springer: 261-276.
"Although
product innovation is a key tool for firms competing in the marketplace, innovating
firms often fail to obtain economic returns from their product innovations
(Koellinger 2008; Pisano 2006). Thus, how an innovating firm can profit from
its product innovation represents an important research question (Li et al.
2010; Teece 1986)";
"Teece’s
(1986) article ..... suggests that both intellectual property protection and
complementary assets are critical for profiting from product innovation (Teece
1986). Following this literature, a number of studies have investigated various
factors that contribute to obtaining returns from product innovation";
"Marketing capability concerns a firm’s
abilities in environmental scanning, market planning, marketing implementation,
and marketing skill development (Su et al. 2010). Environmental scanning
enables a firm scan the market to generate and disseminate market information,
analyze and understand customer needs, and identify market segments for product
innovation; market planning and marketing implementation contribute to
launching a product innovation as well as creating customer loyalty; and
marketing skill enhances the performance of environmental scanning, market
planning, and marketing implementation";
Berends, H., M. Jelinek, I. Reymen and R.
Stultiëns. 2014. "Product
Innovation Processes in Small Firms: Combining Entrepreneurial Effectuation and
Managerial Causation" J PROD INNOV
MANAG 2014;31(3):616–635.
"Prior
research poses a puzzle about small firms’ innovation processes. On the one
hand, an extensive body of research on new product development (NPD) has
identified benefits of a formalized process, with well-planned activities and
decision points .... : a formal product innovation process is considered part
of NPD best practice ..... On the other hand, case study evidence suggests that
small firms seldom use such formalized process structures";
"First, most product innovation
management research has focused solely on large firms, or has failed to
distinguish between large and small firms (Moultrie, Clarkson, and Probert, 2007). Second, those
studies specifically targeting small firm innovation have focused on the
antecedents and consequences of product
innovation efforts ...., identifying effects of interorganizational
collaborations ....; competitor orientation (Ledwith and O’Dwyer, 2009), organizational
structure (Terziovski, 2010), intellectual capital (Leitner, 2011), and the
availability of qualified scientists and engineers";
"....small firms have limited resources for
product innovation projects ..... Lack of financial resources to cover the
costs of innovation was identified as a key barrier in several studies ..... These
constraints exacerbate the risks of innovation for small firms, which cannot
sustain many failures";
"....small firms typically pursue few
innovation projects at any one time—maybe just one, or even none at times
(Laforet, 2008). Consequently, their experience in product innovation is often
limited. With no need to manage a portfolio of innovation projects at the same
time and thus no pressure to select among projects to allocate resources, small
firms have neither opportunity nor incentive to routinize innovation or
formalize NPD stage-gates or selection procedures, as big firms do";
Pitta, D.A. 2008. "Case study: product
innovation and management in a small enterprise" Journal of Product & Brand Management 17/6, Emerald: 416-419.
"Cooper
(1999) ['s]...conceptualization features seven elements that he calls seven
actionable critical success factors that apply to product innovation. The seven
actionable critical success factors are: 1 Solid
up-front homework – to define the product and justify
the product. 2 Voice of the customer – a slave-like dedication to the market and
customer inputs throughout the project. 3 Product
advantage – differentiated, unique benefits, superior
value for the customer. 4 Sharp, stable
and early product definition – before development
begins. 5 A well-planned,
adequately-resourced and proficiently-executed launch. 6 Tough
go/kill decision points or gates –
funnels not tunnels. 7 Accountable, dedicated, supported
cross-functional teams with strong leaders";
Chandra, M. and J.P. Neelankavil. 2008.
"Product development and innovation for developing countries: potential
and challenges" Journal of
Management Development 27(10), Emerald: 1017-1025.
"Product
development is the bloodline for growth for international companies. Product development
and innovation allows companies to gain competitive advantage, attract new
customers, retain exiting customers, and strengthen ties with their distribution
network (Kotler and Keller, 2006; Cooper and Kleinschmidt, 1990)";
"Historically, product development and
innovation has been the strong points of companies from fully industrialized
countries who through R&D or merger and acquisitions were able to introduce
new products that were then marketed globally. These new and innovative
products had substantial market penetration in industrialized countries, but
had a much smaller sales volumes in less developed countries. Products such as
appliances, computers, and telecommunication equipment, when marketed in
developing countries never reached the levels attained in most industrialized
countries";
"When it comes to less developed
countries with smaller markets, these international companies introduce
variations of their successful products from the home country. Studies have shown
that their attempts have not been successful because of the feeble attempts made
by the international companies to attract customers in the developing countries";
"For international companies that target
developing countries with new and innovative products, a host of issues impede
their efforts to succeed in these markets. There are four major areas that pose
problems for international companies in developing new products for the
developing markets .... These are: (1)
price-income levels; (2) technology-developmental issues; (3) capital
constraints; and (4) creativity";
Howell, J.M., C.M. Shea and C.A. Higgins.
2005. "Champions of product innovations: defining, developing, and
validating a measure of champion behavior" Journal of Business Venturing 20, Elsevier: 641–661.
"Studies of product innovation success
highlight that champions, individuals who informally emerge to actively and
enthusiastically promote innovations through the crucial organizational stages,
are necessary to overcome the social and political pressures imposed by an
organization and convert them to its advantage. While studies emphasize the
importance of champions for keeping innovations alive and thriving, empirical
investigations have conceived of champions as either present or absent in the
innovation process";
"Case studies of product innovation
success highlight internal championing as a critical means by which social and
political pressures are applied to overcome organizational inertia and move new
product ideas through the phases of small to large project endeavors, market
launch, and ultimate market success ...... Moreover, champions who initiate new
product development can provide the organization with opportunities to learn
about new environmental niches, to create new competencies, and to develop
strategic options";
Frédéric Le Roy, Marc Robert & Frank
Lasch (2016) Choosing the Best Partner for Product Innovation, International Studies of Management &
Organization, 46:2-3, 136-158.
"Innovation-oriented
firms must build innovation networks with other stakeholders ..... These networks
link firms with series of partners to develop and disseminate innovation. Firms
that succeed in creating such innovation networks by including heterogeneous
partners enhance their capacity to develop innovative projects";
"Cooperation with noncompetitors is
defined as a relationship between at least two firms, organizations, or
institutions that do not compete in their respective markets. Their main
objective is to combine a certain number, or amount, of resources and
competencies to develop an innovative project they normally could not realize
on their own. The absence of competition is a key point that helps develop
trust between cooperators and acts as motivation to intensify cooperation (Whitley
2002)";
"Vertical alliances with partners
increase the level of firm innovation (Tomlinson 2010) and the frequency of
product and process innovation (Santamaria and Surroca 2011). Kang and Kang
(2010) confirm the positive effects on product innovation through R&D
cooperation with universities and customers. Belderbos, Carree, and Lokshin
(2004) find that cooperation with suppliers, universities, and research
institutions increases labor productivity";
No comments:
Post a Comment