Article review of “Management accounting and control practices in a lean manufacturing environment”: for advanced management accounting study
How to present
this article in Harvard reference format?
Fullerton, R.R., Kennedy, F.A. & Widener, S.K., 2013. Management accounting and control practices in a lean manufacturing environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(1), pp.50–71. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2012.10.001
The key research issues addressed by the article are:
1.
Whether and how management accounting and control
practices are used to support lean manufacturing strategies in manufacturing
firms. The study investigates if firms alter their management accounting and
control practices to align with lean manufacturing.
2.
Understanding the relationship between the extent of lean
manufacturing implementation and five specific management accounting and
control practices: value stream costing, inventory tracking, simplified
strategic reporting system, visual performance measurement information, and
employee empowerment.
3.
Gaining insight into how these management accounting and
control practices work together as a package to support a lean manufacturing
strategy, exploring both additive and interactive relationships amongst these
practices.
4.
Providing empirical evidence on the conditional
relationship between inventory tracking and lean manufacturing, particularly
how it is influenced by top management support for change in production
strategies.
These issues respond to gaps in existing accounting
research regarding the alignment and integration of management accounting
controls with lean manufacturing environments.
Describe two main
theories employed in this article.
The two main theories employed in the article are:
1.
Contingency Theory
The article draws on contingency theory to explain that organizations must
adapt their structures, including management accounting and control systems, to
fit specific contingencies such as the environment, organizational size, and
business strategy to perform well. In this context, lean manufacturing
represents a strategic contingency that requires appropriate alignment of
management accounting and control practices.
2.
Congruence Model
(Nadler & Tushman) The congruence model is used to emphasize the importance
of internal consistency or "fit" among organizational
components—people, work, formal and informal environments—to achieve
organizational effectiveness. The model posits that changes in one component (e.g.,
implementing lean manufacturing in work processes) require corresponding
adjustments in other components (e.g., management accounting controls and
employee roles) for congruence. Misfit can lead to inefficiencies or
ineffectiveness.
Together, these theories provide a framework for
understanding how management accounting and control practices can and should be
aligned to support a lean manufacturing strategy, ensuring organizational fit
and improved performance
Describe 3 main
claims of the article in terms of Toulmin's model of argument.
Using Toulmin's
model of argument—which involves claims, grounds (evidence), and warrants
(reasoning linking grounds to claims)—three main claims from the article
are as follows:
1.
Claim 1: The extent of lean manufacturing
implementation positively influences certain management accounting and control
practices (employee empowerment, visual performance measurement information,
simplified strategic reporting system, and value stream costing) and negatively
influences inventory tracking.
- Grounds: Empirical data from 244 US firms and statistical analysis using
structural equation modeling support positive relationships with
empowerment, visual measures, simplified reporting, and value stream
costing, and a negative relationship with inventory tracking (conditional
on top management support).
- Warrant: Lean manufacturing strategies require streamlined, visual, and
empowering controls that align with value stream-oriented operations,
reducing the need for traditional inventory tracking systems.
2.
Claim 2: Management accounting and control practices
operate as an integrated package (i.e., they are interrelated and not purely
independent practices) in supporting lean manufacturing strategies.
- Grounds: Statistical associations among the set of practices were found
even after controlling for lean manufacturing implementation; also, the
interaction between inventory tracking and value stream costing depends on
lean implementation extent.
- Warrant: For congruence and effective organizational fit under lean
manufacturing, coherent combinations (packages) of controls are necessary
rather than isolated practices.
3.
Claim 3: Top management support for change in
production strategies moderates (enables) the reduction in reliance on
inventory tracking when implementing lean manufacturing.
- Grounds: Multigroup analysis split by top management support level revealed
that only firms with high support showed a significant negative
relationship between lean implementation and inventory tracking reliance.
- Warrant: Change initiatives like lean implementation require active top
management backing to facilitate cultural and procedural shifts, such as
reducing traditional inventory monitoring.
These claims
collectively present an argument that aligning management accounting and
control practices with lean manufacturing strategies requires both structural
fit among practices and top management commitment to change.
** references: a collection of management accounting notes; a useful generative AI tool./ also consider another generative AI tool.
No comments:
Post a Comment